Reynaert wrote:
sacrip wrote:
See, I don't consider that to be 'dumbing down' at all. You conveyed the same relevant information in a more relaxed manner. Bigger words aren't always better words, and people often think that those who use them are simply trying to show off how smart they are. I know that's usually not the case with us, but we give off that impression a lot. Don't ever feel like you have to hide your knowledge, but the less syllables you can use, the better.
Don't be silly. The first sentence conveys at least twice as much information than the second, i.e. the second sentence is 'dumbed down' by more than half.
Yes, but in casual conversation, not every datum is needed. "According to Wikipedia," is unnecessary information; A true fact is a true fact, regardless of where you found it. If your audience thinks your wrong, THEN you can cite your source. "Mother's eldest sister" is a long way of saying aunt, and unless it's important to know that it was his MATERNAL aunt AND that she was the eldest of her siblings, this is easily dropped. As for the "in Liverpool" part...if your audience doesn't know the Beatles are from Liverpool, why the heck are they talking about the Beatles, anyways?
_________________
Everything would be better if you were in charge.