Monkeybuttorama wrote:
I feel much the same, though I believe it has something to do with the way it's presented.
In books, you are told what emotions the characters are feeling, or it is fairly easy to judge based on the description of actions (although in a lot of cases, I feel I miss more subtle things
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9fc0/f9fc0a73dd57feae8f63e27df00fdad53bd734e7" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
) and in movies, the musical score changes based on what you are supposed to feel, and the responses/emotions are somewhat exaggerated, and thus easier to place and identify with.
Maybe that's just me ^_^
I agree with this. There's also the fact that no one in a fictional story is going to hurt you, your feelings, or betray you or bully you. It's all happening to someone else. We can identify with the protagonist without taking the risks the protagonist is taking. It's much easier to let ourselves feel because we know there's no direct injury possible to us. If the protagonist loses someone they love, you may feel it with them, but you know it's a sample emotion, not something real happening to you. You know it's not real, so it feels
safe to feel in response to it.
The whole point of fiction is to present a conflict, so yes, the emotional cues are all there, whereas in real life people will frequently hide their feelings either to protect themselves or to protect others, and also sometimes to deceive, and that doesn't happen in fiction in any personally confusing way, only in a way that confuses you about the story, to provide suspense or mystery.