hi there,
this differentiation between affective and cognitive empathy still confuses me. In my opinion empathy is more a feeling, and such a thing as "cognitive empathy" is just a necessary condition to have empathy.
In short, I think cognitive and affective empathy can't be really separated, they belong together.
In order to feel for someone else, you always need to recognize his inner state, which is not obvious, it needs to be detected, you have to recognize his body expressions etc, you have to know his life situation to get why and how he might be happy or not happy now (cognitive empathy).
The feeling which results by knowing this, is a pain or a happyness, its no logical thing, not a matter of true or false, its feelings (affective empathy)
I think the term "cognitive empathy" is misleading, it supposes that there can be a "cognitive empathy" without a "affective empathy", but I see rather the former one as a condition for the later one.
Anyone gets what I wanted to say??
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57ff2/57ff265f4e08602e0af8a325e43a50c473daa53b" alt="Wink ;-)"
best regards,
anton
Yes but one can understand thoughts without feelings, and one can understand feelings without thoughts. They work in different parts of the brain even if the way you detect them is usually the same (i.e. body language, tone of voice, and so on).