NewYork Magazine article about AS & autism
This was a semi-critical article about parents billing the NYC public school system for $80k+ a year tuition for private schools so that the child "can be functionally remediated" and "indistinguishable from other children."
http://nymag.com/news/features/23172/index.html?imw=Y
This article sounds like another one I saw a while ago basically making parents of special education kids looking like money grubbers using the system. It really sounds like a PS propaganda piece. The reason parents flee the PS systems is because most of these schools offer abysmal services for kids. Instead they focus on a super expensive private school which uses behavioral interventions and therefore needs to be more "round the clock"? Is there really any reason a non-residential school could cost $80,000 (well maybe in NY that is not out of this world but it sounds like it is). There is an effort underway to blame special education for all the financial failures of the public schools - instead of focusing on their mismanagement of funds special education feeds off the prejudice of many in the community and say look at how much it costs to educate these kids. And for profit schools like this offer fodder for that.
The reason though many parents can't sue in the suburbs is because they are SMALLER less financially able districts who often have attorneys on call for the sole purpose of denying special education services for kids for cost cutting - not because many of them offer fantastic services. When my son attended a school of choice even though he was considered borderline severely impaired in regards to speech they only offered it twice a week and often did not even provide any speech some weeks. They refused to provide any kind of aide or classroom assistant because they wanted him in a segregated classroom in another school. So this kind of reporting really is biased and makes it looks like all parents of kids with autism are looking for a fancy babysitting service instead of demanding equal treatment.
I confess I didn't read the article...just the excerpts....but why in the hell would a child need "teachers" after 5:30pm at night? I understand there is a different point here...but where the hell are his parents???
_________________
Hey little sister what have you done?
Hey little sister who?s the only one?
What does THAT have to do with being autistic!?!? Look at movies, etc... A LOT of kids are afraid of the dark. YEP, at times I was! You know why? Open area, I was vulnerable, noises, and objects my imagination said could have been people, etc...
Nothing odd! As for the being indistinguishable? I pretty much am. I gather a number of us are to a degree. How could they correct the sensory issues, etc though???
Steve
What does THAT have to do with being autistic!?!? Look at movies, etc... A LOT of kids are afraid of the dark. YEP, at times I was! You know why? Open area, I was vulnerable, noises, and objects my imagination said could have been people, etc...
Nothing odd! As for the being indistinguishable? I pretty much am. I gather a number of us are to a degree. How could they correct the sensory issues, etc though???
Steve
Wonder what "working on" entails - rewards for not complaining or acting out during sensory overloads? Lots of people confuse sensory issues with avoidance issues and think that making someone comply through exposure will take care of it.
*I tried to post this last night and was having trouble and couldn't even get on WP, so here it is again.*
I don't feel the article went out of its way to make the parents look like money grubbers. It was rather critical of the "for profit" schools' methods of financing.
While I empathize with the need to punish and flee the public school system for its discriminating practices (I just pulled out my son and am in the process of legally complaining), I don't empathize with this sense of entitlement these parents have. Kids don't need all the bells and whistles that these for-profit schools offer. And some of those schools are employing "treatments" that are considered abusive by some/many? (ABA).
Making your kids "indistinguishable" shouldn't be a burden the state has to carry. Educating your kids in the "least restrictive environment" is.
These (upper)middle class parents have access, resources and peer pressure to employ lawyers, I'm sure the lower, working class parents don't. Who gets left out of the special education equation when the for-profit schools (and the lawyers who feed them) bleed the NY system dry?
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Article - Scientists May Have Discovered the Cause of Autism |
08 Nov 2024, 2:59 pm |
Interesting article about "four core subtypes" of autism |
13 Oct 2024, 10:44 am |
Article on Being Flaky |
11 Oct 2024, 8:56 am |
Nice article about Daryl Hannah |
Today, 3:14 am |