I agree with Rattus for the most part. Up until aqbout 5 years ago, I felt as though I was always trailing behind the rest of my generation somewhat, because I wasn't up-to-date on contemporary technology (cellphones, computers), I didn't necessarily get into current music or television shows, usually preferring stuff that had ripened for some years. When I was in secondary school in the early 2000s, I was always listening to 80s pop music- George Michael's and Madonna's 80s stuff. I watched Transformers and other old cartoons. I felt like a kid that was out-of-touch with his generation.
Then in 2007, I read an epic medieval poem in German, called 'Erec'. I absolutely loved it and I was really getting into the sentiments and life of the 12th century and imagined how it would have been for the people to have heard this story being sung by a bard. And I also read a couple more medieval epics in several languages. And it hit me: I was enjoying these stories as surely as I would enjoy contemporary action movies with Van Damme, Stallone, or Schwarzenegger- enjoying them as much as Star Trek or Buffy. And I realised this: art is timeless. Yes, all art is dated, and very much created from the perspective of the artist's time. BUT it can be enjoyed by anyone, living in any time or place. It doesn't necessarily lose its power. And with that, the borders between generations became irrelevant to me.
I should say that I still walk around with a Walkman, and not an MP3-player, even though the latter would probably be more economic and convenient. There's just something I like about the limitations of only carrying about 80 minutes of music, or 17 songs, instead of the decadence of having 1K+ songs with me. I don't need the wealth that modern technology can offer me- honestly, it just floods me.
_________________
clarity of thought before rashness of action