I have noticed recently that the way I conceptualize people (by themselves and in groups) is probably not normal. I think of people as matrices consisting of their physical appearance, what I know of their personality, and where they fit in my social dynamics theories. In my social dynamics theories, I classify people as having generally two types of friendship interactions. The first is duos or trios of very close friends, "best friends" if you will. Most people belong to 1-3 of these groups. The second type of interactions consists of "friend groups", "drifters", and "loners". "Friend groups" generally consist of five or more people, who tend to 'hang out' together, but aren't necessarily extremely close friends. Many people belong almost exclusively to one "friend group". There are also those I consider "drifters" who associate freely with two or more "friend groups". Drifters often do not quite feel as though they fully 'fit in' with any one friend group. Finally, there are the "loners". They do not generally participate in the activities of any of the "friend groups", preferring to associate only within their duos or trios. Keep in mind, people who are largely exclusive to one "friend group" can be part of a duo or trio with people from another "friend group", because the two types of interaction are mostly independent of one another.
Does anyone else maintain this sort of system of classifications? (Please bear in mind, as I have based this analysis on interactions exclusively between girls, this may or may not apply to boys.) I would appreciate any sort of feedback!
_________________
Life is a long series of juxtapositions, ironies, and paradoxes.