Does advocacy impose political correctness?

Post Reply New Topic

For those who find the term vague, political correctness refers to any form of behavior seeking not to offend, often based on what's acceptable by the status quo of society. It's used to apply behavior denoting a large types of human differences and abilities. It's mainly pejorative though it's origins I don't know.

In the past, I have seen advocacy groups, like Autism or asperger's awareness, be used to impose a doctrine on the rest of society that only this segment of society seems to pay attention to. A high example of this is how we like to impose the anti-cure and acceptance doctrine on the rest of our society. I don't think society likes this too much. Call me a sellout, but I feel reasonably accepted in my life today. I don't like political correctness either but I do understand that each human has their own needs to a point.

I don't like political correctness. In fact, I insist on being called "autistic" rather than "a person with autism". While I appreciate the attempt to reinforce the basic humanity of autistics, I don't like the polite way that person-first language approaches it, as though autism were something shameful that made you not quite human. Just like "female" implies humanity and doesn't need to be replaced with "person with femaleness", "autistic" should imply humanity as well.

So, for me, part of self-advocacy is actually to tone down the political correctness and say it like it is--because autism is not something to be ashamed of, and talking about my autism is not an insult.