Fnord wrote:
The key word is "may"; as in, "maybe".
Let's see how closely our data correlates with theirs, shall we?
Well, here's some more
supporting research:
Quote:
We report an experimental study designed to test the following hypothesis derived from clinical observations: There is an elevated frequency in left-handed individuals and in their families of immune disease, migraine, and developmental learning disorders. In two separate investigations the frequency of these conditions was compared in strongly left-handed subjects and in strongly right-handed controls. In each of the investigations we found markedly higher frequencies of immune disease in the left-handers than in the right-handers. The rate of learning disabilities was also much higher in the left-handers than in the right-handers in both investigations. In a second study the frequency of left-handedness was compared in patients with migraine or immune disease and in general population control subjects free of these disorders. There was a higher frequency of left-handedness in patients with migraine and myasthenia gravis than in controls. We present a brief outline of a hypothesis that may account for an increased frequency of immune disease in left-handers and in their families.
More research:
Quote:
The handedness in three randomly sampled groups of people with learning disabilities consisting of patients with Down's syndrome, epilepsy, and autism were studied using a validated instrument. All subjects were controlled for neurological and other medical disorders. A statistically significant increase in left-handedness and ambiguous handedness compared with the general population was found in all groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of left-handedness between the three groups.
Handedness in autistic children:
Quote:
A test of handedness in a sample of 20 autistic children and 25 normal children revealed marked differences. The frequency of non-right-handedness in normal children was 12%, whereas it was 65% in autistic children. The significance of this difference for the etiology of autism is discussed.
That was a small sample size, but 65% not being right-handed is a bit high even for that. I think the actual incidence is likely to be demonstrated as lower with larger samples.
This study - with 20 autistic children and 20 NT children - found 5% of the NTs (1) and 15% of the autistic children (3) were left-handed. It also found that consistency of handedness was lower for the autistic children.
I think, given the above, that there is a correlation between being autistic and not being right-handed. Given that handedness is a matter of neurology, and autism is a matter of neurology, this should be neither far-fetched nor surprising. Just because the OP relied on anecdotal evidence over statistical evidence doesn't mean he's wrong (but said OP really should have looked for research before asking, because the use of anecdotal evidence to imply statistical goes nowhere).