LisaFiene wrote:
Well, John's "John" to me - I don't know how I feel about a label. Why can't we just say that everybody's different?
John isn't any less John because his brain is configured in such a way as he qualifies for a diagnosis of Asperger's syndrome. You might ask which parts of John are caused by his AS and which are 'just John' and I could understand that question. I could rephrase a little and ask "which parts of Lisa are caused because she is neurotypical (i.e. she has an "average" brain) and which are 'just Lisa'?" and I would be asking an identical question which would be equally valid. What I'm trying to say is that the fact that some of a given person's personality traits are caused by them being neurologically atypical does not mean they are any less a part of the whole person that in somebody who is neurologically typical and displays traits associated with being neurologically typical.
You are correct in stating that "everybody's different" and I understand your reluctance in applying 'labels'; that is a very common reaction, people often think that a label will stigmatise the individual. Labels can, however, sometimes be useful. One of the criteria for being diagnosed with Asperger's or any kind of autism is having
lifelong difficulty in certain areas. These difficulties are often enough for somebody to be extremely stigmatised without a label. It can be important for the person who has AS to recognise that their difficulties are caused by the way their brain is wired. Having the label, the sheet of paper saying "John meets the diagnostic criteria for Asperger's syndrome" can help a lot with allowing the person to forgive themselves for their lifetime difficulties. This isn't to say that it relieves the person of the responsibility for self-improvement, it just means that attempts at self improvement can be directed in ways which are more likely to work. The label can also help in getting other people to understand. People's attitudes to this vary immensely; some people never or rarely disclose, some people routinely do so. For those who do choose to tell others the fact that the person actually has a diagnosis, a 'thing' which the person being told can build their understanding around, can sometimes be helpful. Sometimes additional support or accommodations can be made at work, school etc and in some places government financial support is available (I will even continue to receive the disability benefit I receive (I live in the UK) if I started work tomorrow).
So to summarise: John is still John,
nothing has changed except he now knows why he has certain difficulties. It might be a while before both him and you come to terms with it but in the end it's probably a good thing that this was established for certain. There are a lot of simple things which you can do (you may already have been making some of these accommodations without having realised or discussed it) which will make your life together easier. I'm talking about things such as you clearly and explicitly explaining what is required of him in some situations rather than expecting him to know. For example: "John, I am too busy to perform
task x but it needs to be done today. Could you please do it before 9pm?" is probably
much more likely to result in
task x being done today than "John,
task x needs doing". If you want to know more about this kind of thing it might be best to make a different thread or do some searching on the site.