Dave1985 wrote:
This kind of thing is fun, but aren't we just reinforcing stereotypes by doing this? And what would these people think about the things people are saying about them?
I think of it as more like trying to pull a Sherlock Holmes--you know, figure out information about a person based on their appearance.
Like, if you saw me, you would probably be able to figure out I was autistic, or at least that I had sensory issues, even if you couldn't watch my body language or hear me speak. I'm female but don't wear makeup. If you checked the back of my shirt, you might be able to see that I've cut the tags out of my clothing, which is all loose, soft, cotton clothing. I've cut my hair very short, but there's no other indication that I'm trying to make a fashion statement. My shoes are always wide and sturdy; my nails are always cut short. Looking closely at my skin you might see faint scars, evidence of self-injury. I wear glasses, which means I am more likely to do a lot of close-up work (reading and computer use), and that I either can't afford or can't stand contacts. You would also see that my clothing is clean, but often has a bit of cat hair on it, meaning that I am a cat owner who either doesn't know or doesn't care that you are supposed to clean off cat hair before you go out in public. Looking very closely you would see a callous on my hand where a crochet hook is held. You might also notice small stains or tears in the right cuff of my pants, where at some point the cloth was caught on a bicycle chain. I am fat and unathletic but my shoes show the wear that comes from walking for transportation, and the right one is more worn than the left, suggesting an uneven gait.
All of that together puts me firmly at least in the range of eccentric, low-income, physically sensitive, introverted, physically awkward, and more connected to animals than people. I'd give Sherlock at least a three-quarters chance of coming up with autism.