gwynfryn wrote:
dgd1788 wrote:
Ever since Asperger's Syndrome was discovered, I've had this one question: Is there such thing as a geek? I say this because A geek is obviously an Aspie, they aren't a nerd unless they are a neurotypical (in my opinion.) Are we (aspies) automatically categorized in the geek category or loser?
What do you mean by"loser"? Who decided? What's wrong with being a geek? Is it a crime to be scientificly proficient? Do you detest being rational, or competent?
dgd1788 wrote:
II would have to say loser because people do judge, and they judge unfairly by way of everyone else. (in my opinion) No-one thinks about geeks anymore, I don't know about you guys but I'd like to be called a geek sometimes. It is a compliment. I think the part of my Asperger's accounts for me to be a geek. However, I've become more gregarious in a space of 4 years. My personality changes, the more I am in a social environment (school) the more I think of myself as a geek. I feel that I am myself when I am in the comfort of my own home.
I am gwynfryn, you are you; I don't expect to hear from you any time soon.
Again, this wasn't meant to be negative: I meant that people could call you a loser if they wanted to and it would make sense to their friends, not that everyone (in a whole) can call you that, but that mean people could, I guess.
_________________
If great minds think alike, does that mean that stupid minds think differently?