Quote:
I really dislike the term neurotypical, because other neurological paradigms exist besides "autistic" and "non-autistic." To give an example, my non-autistic sister has severe epilepsy. Her frequent seizures arguably have more of an impact on her life than ASD has on mine. By the standards of this board, she is extremely NT: she is intensely social, loves chitchat, makes eye contact with strangers, has no special interests or unusual habits, and is extremely graceful and poised. She works in high-end retail (a career that would be closed to most of us, me included) and is very good at her job. However, her brain is probably at least as divergent from the norm as mine is. Therefore, I don't think it would be accurate to refer to her as NT, even though she is most assuredly not autistic.
I wouldn't call her NT. You don't have to be autistic to be non-NT.
I like the term neurodivergent for the opposite of NT. It sounds and looks more distinct than neuroatypical, and it has its own acronym - ND.
As for the opposite of autistic, that's allistic. And you can be allistic and not NT, if you have epilepsy or Down Syndrome or any of the myriad of other conditions out there that affect the brain but are not part of the autism spectrum.
Also, I like the term 'cousin' for people who aren't quite autistic, but have overlapping traits. For example, people with schizophrenia.