Asperger, language precision and interpreting statutes...

Post Reply New Topic

Right... it has been established that Asperger people are more precise with language... I will present here a very controversial and (in my opinion) gravely misunderstood provision of the Highway Safety Code here in Quebec... Provisions like this are broken down into essential elements of the offence, each of which must be proven by the prosecution in court... I want to have people's opinions as to what these are and what they mean...

It means "if your car breaks down in the middle of the lane it aint your fault, but if you purposely park your car in the middle of the highway with the intension of blocking traffic your gonna get arrested, and charged."

Not much to it really.

I'm not very precise with language but I think it means something like during road repairs or construction.
Mostly It means you will need a really good and expensive lawyer to interpret this legal babble if you wish to avoid prosecution in a court of law.

I think it just means "Don't block the highway with your stuff, or your stuff will be removed/confiscated".

It refers to intentionally blocking traffic, as opposed to accidentally blocking traffic.

"Concerted" implies that it is being done by a group, not just an individual.

I'm thinking for instance, not sure if people see this happen much in other places, but around here sometimes on weekends a group like the Shriners will congregate at an intersection to ask for donations, or sell doughnuts for charity, that kind of thing. I think the point would be that it is okay for a group to do something like that as long as they don't hold up traffic in any way. They just make themselves visible and available you can stop and give money or not. But if it was done with the intent to obstruct traffic, like if they get in front of your car and stop you from proceeding down the road it would be illegal.

The main examples that come to mind for me would be people asking for donations, or selling things or perhaps blocking the road as a form of political protest. I can't think of any other reason why a group would get together to impede or stop traffic.

I see some people are suggesting that the purpose of the action may be something other than obstructing traffic... think about this; does anyone really think that's what it says?

By the way, "concerted action" is a legal expression; in tort law it's used for joint liability and requires a "common design", which if used here, would be to obstruct traffic. Also it is used in criminal law when dealing with aiding and abetting, it's said that there is a concerted action involving the principals and those assisting them. Also, in issues having to do with cartels and anti-competitive acts by companies, and finally in labour law where industrial actions is described as "concerted action". In each case, it involves a "mutually contrived plan", as Black's law dictionary puts it, thus this requires that those in the action participate in planning the action...

There is a difference between intention to block and intention to obstruct. An intention to obstruct is an intention to have a traffic jam, more or less... an intention to block may be done with another purpose. In French the world used is "entrave" which translates most directly to "fetter" as in chain down and prevent... you need to want to slow down traffic for its own sake.

You actually expect the laws of Quebec to make sense - that's a tall order.

(PS - look under my avatar and see where I live I hate driving in Gatineau)