Shep wrote:
Am I the only one here that feels like we don't need to be cured? I mean, "cure" means something can be "fixed" and is broken if left alone. I love who I am, I'm not broken, I don't need to be "cured", and refuse to try any "fix". I can see if this were a
treatment rather than a flat-out cure, but this is Autism Speaks we're talking about, the same asswipes that compared Autism to Cancer. What am I missing?
I'm like you in that I really don't want a cure either, for the same exact reasons. I'm excited about the possibility of a treatment, just something that might help deal with some of the more negative and disabling aspects of autism, definatly not something that would "take away" our autism.
There is one passage from the article that shows some evidence for a it being a treatment and not a cure:
Quote:
Previous clinical trials
In 2012, Drs. Lemonnier and Ben-Ari reported on the promising results of a small clinical trial with 60 children with Asperger syndrome, a type of autism. A three-month course of daily bumetanide temporarily reduced the severity of autism symptoms in three-quarters of the children. The treatment also produced low potassium levels, the drug?s common side effect. This was treated with potassium supplements. The researchers are now conducting additional clinical trials in Europe.
Of course, with it being writen by autism speaks, there is a significant emphasis on the possibility of a cure. This is my personal opinion regarding autismspeaks. The face of the organization, their propaganda, representation of autism, emphasis on finding a cure, and so on, are all things that I really dislike and am often offended by. However there is some very worthwhile and actually helpful research that they have funded so far, although these studies don't usually grab attention. Even so, this in no way redeems autism speaks from anything.
_________________
"Curiosity killed the cat." Well, I'm still alive, so I guess that means I'm not a cat.