Norny wrote:
To autistic homosexuals:
1. Do you feel that your presentation of autism more accurately matches that typically observed in the opposite sex?
- If yes, how do you feel you differ (if at all) from autistic heterosexuals of your given sex, strictly in terms of your autism?
- If no, do you perceive your homosexuality to alter the presentation of your autism in any specific way?
To autistic heterosexuals/alternative:
1. What are your opinions concerning the role of sexual identity in a person's autistic presentation?
----------------------------------------------
That is all.
I have some questions that yours automatically made me want to know.
1 Do you feel that your presentation of autism more accurately matches that typically observed in the opposite sex?
How are you defining the difference in autism between males and females? maybe women spin counterclockwise as opposed the men spinning clockwise?
-If yes, how do you feel you differ (if at all) from autistic heterosexuals of your given sex, strictly in terms of your autism?
So how would you take that into account, when personalities differ from person to person, autism differs from person to person (hence the spectrum), and life experiences are different? Just trying to understand the qualifications.
-If no, do you perceive your homosexuality to alter the presentation of your autism in any specific way?
Do you have a working theory that there are distinct differences between a homosexual's presentation of autism compared to a heterosexual presentation of autism that clearly can be linked to strictly sexual orientation influence?
To autistic heterosexuals/alternative:
What are your opinions concerning the role of sexual identity in a person's autistic presentation?
Wouldn't it have been better to leave opinion out of scientific inquest? That's what this is isn't it? Then again, with no clear definitions as to what makes a heterosexual female autistic different than a heterosexual male autistic in autism traits; the overly bias nature of the questions geared to putting one group of people on the spot; and illiciting the opinions of the opposite group of something they have no first hand knowledge about, makes me wonder...What is the actual intent in your questions?