Ganondox wrote:
It's the way it's written, it just comes off as rubbing you wrong if you are being described. It's not that it prevents you from reading it, it's about tact, being respected. I want to know if this is a legitimate problem, or if I'm just taking it the wrong way and all textbooks are like that for all groups of people.
Could you give me an example? I'm trying to understand what you mean.
Do you mean psychology textbooks that describe autism? If so, I'd probably agree with you that some authors aren't well versed enough on the subject to actually be writing on it. I noticed that with my intro to psychology textbook, but that's true for a lot of disorders, not just autism, so I suppose it depends on the textbook in question and what kind of textbook it is. I wouldn't expect someone who's a specialist in neurodevelopmental disorders to be writing an intro psych textbook, for example, so I expect those who author them to only know the basics about these types of disorders. (Now an author of a developmental psych textbook might be a bit more knowledgeable, but there's no guarantee, I suppose.) But I saw you also brought up gender and race studies textbooks, so I was wondering how (or even why) the disorders would be described in those types of textbooks. I've never heard of that before (unless it's specifically about autism, of course).
_________________
Diagnosed with ADHD combined type (02/09/16) and ASD Level 1 (04/28/16).