Raised By Wolves wrote:
I love eating with others, especially when I've made the food. Sharing food is deeply humanising, it's a fundamental human ritual. It's why religious ceremonial often involves sharing food such as Holy Communion, it creates a bond between people.
It almost seems like food worship to me. Which makes sense when you think of early hunters and feasts. But is it necessary today?
sonicallysensitive wrote:
androbot01 wrote:
Why is eating as a group made such a fuss of?
Logistics/efficiency? Given electricity/gas is being used, it makes sense to cook for more than one, as cooking individually would use more energy, therefore be more costly.
I can't imagine deciding when to eat based on electrical consumption. That would be bring a slave to the machine.
Quote:
androbot01 wrote:
I prefer to just eat when hungry. And trying to converse with someone while eating, I find to be unpleasant.
Don't talk whilst eating then?
It's ruder not to talk than not to eat.
Quote:
androbot01 wrote:
Also, why is it necessary to eat when you don't like the food or aren't hungry if a group is having a meal?
Surely depends on circumstance - it could be seen as rude to accept a dinner invite then not eat. However, if you're going out for the night and a meal is part of the night out, you could just say you're not hungry, or go a walk whilst others are eating, then catch up afterwards.
It's your decision to conform (or not) - no-one is forcing you.
I agree, it would be rude to accept a dinner invitation and not eat. I hate eating people's cooking though -again the related fussing.
And I very rarely eat with others. I prefer to talk over coffee.