Page 1 of 3 [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

OlivG
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 25 Jun 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 121

08 Jan 2014, 1:39 pm

Image

Jokes aside, which historical people do you think displayed autistic traits?

I find this one particularly interesting (a tomboyish female queen):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christina,_Queen_of_Sweden



JSBACHlover
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2013
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,282

08 Jan 2014, 3:42 pm

Archimedes



drchcat85
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 4 Apr 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 100
Location: in my inner world

23 Mar 2015, 5:35 pm

Socrates



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

23 Mar 2015, 6:02 pm

Why Socrates?

He (according to Plato) advocated the Socratic method--which involves being quite social with each other.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

23 Mar 2015, 6:51 pm

The glory of the ancient geeks?

Maybe Pythagoras.

His home was stormed by a Roman soldier when the city fell to the Romans. He told the intruder not to bother him until the geometrician finished solving his dodecahedron problem. The soldier hacked him to death with his sword. Most NTs, even mathematicians, back then would have had the street smarts not to brush off an angry Roman soldier like that. Oh well.

You cant really diagnose anyone in the past.

But besides Pythagoras there arent many figures that we know enough about personally to even suspect that they were even strong contenders to be aspies until we get to Isaac Newton in the late 1600's.



RhodyStruggle
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 508

23 Mar 2015, 7:25 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Why Socrates?

He (according to Plato) advocated the Socratic method--which involves being quite social with each other.


If everyday socializing took the form of Socratic inquiry I wouldn't shun it.

In Phaedrus Socrates excuses himself from learning about things that don't interest him on the basis that he doesn't yet know himself well enough to bother trying to know about anything else. That strikes me as autistic in the literal, non-diagnostic sense.

I think a strong case could also be made for Diogenes the Cynic being autistic.


_________________
From start to finish I've made you feel this
Uncomfort in turn with the world you've learned
To love through this hate to live with its weight
A burden discerned in the blood you taste


NEtikiman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 546
Location: Massachusetts, USA

23 Mar 2015, 7:30 pm

How ancient are we talking about? If you're only going for historical, then I'm thinking about Nikola Tesla. He was obsessed with electricity and defied conventional ideas in favor of his own method. He struggled to convey his ideas to the general public in social arenas, preferring to conduct (puns!) live demonstrations.

When his ideas were not financially viable due to his intellectual property stakes, he gave up his rights to further his creations (I'm omitting/glossing over a LOT of details here for the sake of brevity).

This was a time when the likes of Thomas Edison and JP Morgan and other tycoons were becoming fabulously wealthy from the burgeoning electric empires. He was mostly motivated by intrinsic drives instead of societal motivators.


_________________
Don't want the truth? Don't come to the park!


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

23 Mar 2015, 7:30 pm

Maybe...

But he sat around amongst people, and engaged in dialogue without much trouble. He had students (like Plato). He might have been a political maverick. I don't see Aspie in him, though. I see "somewhat reserved philosopher--who, nevertheless, would not sell out to government interests."



Dantac
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,672
Location: Florida

23 Mar 2015, 8:10 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Why Socrates?

He (according to Plato) advocated the Socratic method--which involves being quite social with each other.


Picture it.. two aspies sitting down talking about a shared special interest without the distraction of NT socializing detritus getting in the way.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

23 Mar 2015, 8:24 pm

It didn't happen that way in the case of Socrates. He always had NT students surrounding him.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,739
Location: Long Island, New York

23 Mar 2015, 8:25 pm

God.

For the idea the deity was autistic: Mostly alone. Did things by command not by consensus, Sense of Justice, said to invent sensory

Against: If he made man in his own image he was 98% NT. Multitasking and Executive Functioning abilities are well Godlike
:wink:


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Adamantium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2013
Age: 1025
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,863
Location: Erehwon

23 Mar 2015, 8:43 pm

Thoth and Seshat.

Because I said so and because it is true.

The other gods were social while Thoth did the math and made books.

People were confused about the magic. They were simply not ready for physics and chemistry.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

23 Mar 2015, 8:46 pm

Maybe some of the scribes in a place like Sumer were autistic in some sense.



Alexanderplatz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2015
Posts: 1,524
Location: Chester Britain

23 Mar 2015, 9:03 pm

There is an odd figure in British History called Jeremy Bentham who was a philosopher, famous for his ideas of the greatest happiness of the greatest number. He even tried to invent a system to measure happiness with units of "felicitude".

His ideas influenced odd things, like prison design.

The man was thorough and saw his obsessions through - I remember being told in a lecture that not only was he obsessed with reforming the way people voted, he took great care over ideas of the design of the ballot box as well. This going into detail of the parts of things could be an autistic trait.

He's a very interesting character to read about:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Bentham

From wikipedia " . . . study by Philip Lucas and Anne Sheeran argues that he may have had Asperger's Syndrome"



Last edited by Alexanderplatz on 23 Mar 2015, 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

23 Mar 2015, 9:05 pm

I've studied Bentham.

I wish his ideas about population were invalid--but they were, actually, pretty valid.

I'd have to read a biography of him in order to determine "possible" autism--since it really is difficult to diagnosed someone retrospectively.



Alexanderplatz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2015
Posts: 1,524
Location: Chester Britain

23 Mar 2015, 9:16 pm

I remember that John Fowles called Bentham a crypto fascist, and I find there is something chillingly cold about Bentham.

That panopticon idea is pretty nasty, this whole idea of the society of the observed doesn't seem very British. Had he a French influence on his thinking?

Yes, have agreement with you, Asperger's can be difficult to diagnose when experts have the actual person on the slide in front of them, let alone with History in the way.

I remember in the 1980's Beethoven was often spoken of as possibly being bipolar, now he's a candidate for ASD, and this will probably change again with the DSM.



Last edited by Alexanderplatz on 23 Mar 2015, 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.