naturalplastic wrote:
Maybe they are "Downers", and we all are "Uppers".
That sounds a bit derogatory as a "downer" is generally used for a killjoy or someone who crashes the party.
Now I'm not word-police and the avenger of hurt feelings, so it's not that I get upset or anything, like some people make it their business on forums, I just see it unlikely that they would refer to themselves this way as they undoubtedly have heard the term "downer" be used in a derogatory way.
As for autism related words and expressions, in some ways, I like the usage of NT, but in other ways it sort of suggests that non-autistics are bland or uninteresting by being neuro -"typical". I.e "neurologically like everybody else". Since autism is a spectrum and a lot of these people are also probably just a little bit autistic, it might just be unnoticeable traits that don't really make a difference; but taking that into account it seems to suggest that they are all the same neurologically. Autism is only one neurological among many, so to use neuro-typical about someone who might have some other neurological difference seems like an unnecessary categorization.
But I must admit that in times of self-pity, muttering "those darn neuro-typicals" feels satisfying.
We're all a little bit tribal, like it or not