Today at work, I was really thirsty and wishing I could have a bottle of water under the counter to drink instead of having to get permission to leave my register to get a drink.
This got me thinking about the reason we aren't allowed to have anything to drink where a customer might see us- it would apparently come off as unprofessional or rude.
Now, if I was in a store, and I saw a cashier reach under the counter and grab a bottle of water and take a drink, I'd think "She must be thirsty, it's pretty dry in here and she has to talk to alot of people." That's all.
It confuses me because I assume that most company policies are based on NT reactions, and Aspies supposedly lack empathy, while NTs are supposed to be empathetic, but it seems to me that expecting someone to go hours without anything to drink is not showing much empathy.
Thinking more about empathy, if I see someone whose hairstyle or jewelry is unusual in a way that does not appeal to me, I just assume there must be a reason for it, and that people make choices about their appearance based on personal aesthetics or what is considered attractive by people they want to attract. However, I've encountered many people who seemed NT who would assume I dyed my hair purple because I wanted attention, or that I was irresponsible, on drugs, or some other negative thing. It seems difficult for most people to understand that different people have different aesthetics, different values, etc. I might be confused about why someone would alter their appearance in a way I find ugly (like spending way too much time in a tanning bed) but it would never occur to me that the person made that choice in hopes of getting negative reactions like mine.
So, is this just my own personal weirdness, or do other people here feel the same way?
Am I just interpreting empathy in an unusual way? How can people be seen as empathetic when they show so little tolerance of variations in human behavior?