raenur wrote:
neilson_wheels wrote:
I know some people who I like, but don't see them very often. They generally have an alternative mindset and are also outliers of society, but there are no obligations either way so I don't see them as friends, maybe this is just me being pedantic?
I don't think so. The word "friend" is applied to a lot of relationships which are not all the same. It certainly isn't specific enough for me to make sense of the statement. In some cases people believe people are friends when they aren't.
At the moment I have a couple of relationships with people that I consider important. I've attempted to stop trying to reconcile the use of "friend" in both contexts.
Maybe when you talk about friends you expect some sort of interdependence, where one person
needs the other. For NTs frequency of meeting have no affect on the use of the word friend.
I think we're looking for something more fundamental, and disappointment with friends is probably down to a difference in expectation.
Personally I think giving up is a bit too final. I have to accept that I'm not going to maintain many friendships, and I have to be careful about who I choose to put effort into.
Hello Raenur, I agree with what you are saying and the term 'friend' is subjective.
IMO friends are people who actively seek the company of, and/or contact with each other. There is a sense of obligation in that, if a friend invites you to do something together, or makes contact, then it would be considered rude to not turn up consistently, not return the invitation or not to reply to messages left.
As I do not have these relationships with any person then I do not consider to have any friends as such.
What I was trying to imply to the OP, (Not very clearly, but thank you for highlighting this.) was that there are people in this world who do not require such levels of commitment and maybe he should try to seek out these types of people.