PorridgeGuy wrote:
Frankly I don't think any MB test is accurate since the whole MBTI theory is questiobable. There are many sources which explain why if you search for it. The big five is generally regarded as a much better test. It's a pity though because I really like the neat categorization, and felt that INTJ/INTP both seems to fit me well. But me or you liking the system and description better unfortunately doesn't make it any more valid. It may still be entertaining though
The MBTI style tests are not only invalid because the theory behind them is weak. They are also invalid because on re-test, over 50% of test-takers change
at least one of their four codes. Personality refers to stable traits, and if your test doesn't have stable results, how is that a personality test?
My sister was once very taken with the MBTI that was being administered at her company. I mentioned casually that the test was not considered very valid by academic psychologists. She was upset, and protested, "But the facilitator seemed
very sincere!" Yeah, and so do a lot of fortune-tellers.
_________________
A finger in every pie.