Oh, those poor ignorant researchers... (minor rant)

Page 1 of 2 [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Edenthiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2014
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,820
Location: S.F Bay Area

08 Apr 2016, 10:40 pm

"researchers from the University of Vermont found that children with autism tended to focus more on a speaker’s mouth instead of the eyes when the conversation turned to emotional topics, such as what makes the children sad or scared."

...Ya' think?

“What you talk about really matters for children with ASD [autism spectrum disorder],” said lead author Tiffany Hutchins, an assistant professor of communication sciences and disorders."

...Because up til now, everyone thought we were just room decorations?

http://www.ktva.com/eye-movements-may-hold-clues-to-treating-children-with-autism-311/

To the researchers: Next time, get to know us. Learn from us. Maybe you won't seem so...ignorant about our issues.

This is why slogans like "Nothing about us, without us" are so important.


_________________
“For small creatures such as we the vastness is bearable only through love.”
―Carl Sagan


ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 37,440
Location: Long Island, New York

09 Apr 2016, 1:33 am

Decades of autism "awareness" and this is considered cutting edge research :( Maybe in another 20 years they will figure out we look at the mouth or nose or away as coping mechanism for not only emotional conversations.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

It is Autism Acceptance Month.

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

09 Apr 2016, 1:58 am

Forget the research, get me in touch with the group that provided her the grant. I've got a great hypothesis I could use some fat research money on: I theorize that when a tree falls in the woods and no one's around to hear it, it does indeed make a sound.



VisInsita
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 29 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 375
Location: Finland

09 Apr 2016, 2:17 am

Aristophanes wrote:
Forget the research, get me in touch with the group that provided her the grant. I've got a great hypothesis I could use some fat research money on: I theorize that when a tree falls in the woods and no one's around to hear it, it does indeed make a sound.


:lol: :lol: :lol:



Pieplup
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2015
Age: 21
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 2,658
Location: Maine

09 Apr 2016, 8:44 am

Aristophanes wrote:
Forget the research, get me in touch with the group that provided her the grant. I've got a great hypothesis I could use some fat research money on: I theorize that when a tree falls in the woods and no one's around to hear it, it does indeed make a sound.

I sense Sarcasm. Sarcasm?


_________________
[color=#0066cc]ever changing evolving and growing
I am pieplup i have level 3 autism and a number of severe mental illnesses. I am rarely active on here anymore.
I run a discord for moderate-severely autistic people if anyone would like to join. You can also contact me on discord @Pieplup


SocOfAutism
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 2 Mar 2015
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,000

09 Apr 2016, 10:55 am

Some jack*sses just gave like a million dollars to the neurology department at my university to study autism. I'm the only one in the sociology department studying autism and I am unfunded. Partially because if you take funding, you have to do the type of research that the funders want. That's probably why we keep seeing the same garbage over and over about earlier identification and treatment.

I can answer the question for those researchers for them, simply because I know a lot of autistic people and have also read a ton of OTHER research. Autistic kids don't get much information from eyeballs and also find staring at them unpleasant. They're probably looking at the mouths to see the the expression change. Does this emotion go with a downturned mouth, or an upturned one?



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

09 Apr 2016, 11:00 am

Edenthiel wrote:
"researchers from the University of Vermont found that children with autism tended to focus more on a speaker’s mouth instead of the eyes when the conversation turned to emotional topics, such as what makes the children sad or scared."

...Ya' think?

“What you talk about really matters for children with ASD [autism spectrum disorder],” said lead author Tiffany Hutchins, an assistant professor of communication sciences and disorders."

...Because up til now, everyone thought we were just room decorations?

http://www.ktva.com/eye-movements-may-hold-clues-to-treating-children-with-autism-311/

To the researchers: Next time, get to know us. Learn from us. Maybe you won't seem so...ignorant about our issues.

This is why slogans like "Nothing about us, without us" are so important.


So are they saying that NT children keep their eyes locked on your eyes when you ask them about emotional subjects?



League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,297
Location: Pacific Northwest

09 Apr 2016, 11:11 am

Really? What's the big deal about looking at mouths? Deaf people do that too and anyone when they are hard of hearing or have auditory processing disorders. I look at people faces like their mouths and noses or ears or hair. To me that is good eye contact.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


Aristophanes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Apr 2014
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,603
Location: USA

09 Apr 2016, 11:56 am

Pieplup wrote:
Aristophanes wrote:
Forget the research, get me in touch with the group that provided her the grant. I've got a great hypothesis I could use some fat research money on: I theorize that when a tree falls in the woods and no one's around to hear it, it does indeed make a sound.

I sense Sarcasm. Sarcasm?

Yes, sorry, that was sarcasm. I use to tag things like [joke][/joke], but I've been forgetting lately.

edit: grammar.



Brittniejoy1983
Toucan
Toucan

Joined: 27 Oct 2015
Age: 42
Posts: 284
Location: New Jersey

09 Apr 2016, 1:00 pm

Aristophanes, that was hilarious. Thank you.

Edenthiel, I'm a fan. Whenever I see you on a post, it seems highly likely to contain the complex information I crave, but hate finding.

That being said, why is there no :headdesk: or 'head hitting a wall' emoji on here? If nothing but for this, it seems necessary.


_________________
Aspie Quiz: 148 ND/50 NT
AQ: 41 (AQ-10: 9) EQ: 17 SQ: 31 FQ: 44 RAADS-R: 178
ASD Diagnosed 4/22/2016


zkydz
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2015
Age: 64
Posts: 3,215
Location: USA

09 Apr 2016, 3:18 pm

Oddly enough, I look at mouths many times just because it helps me understand words in different environments.

Edit reading through the posted article I was struck by the sheer ignorance of this:
"“You just change a few words by talking about what people do versus how they feel and you can have a profound impact on where eyes go for information,” she said in a university news release."

Ummmm, if others are like me, I am great at describing actions and not feelings. I can recount those things but can't find words or even understand many times when people ask something dealing with feelings. I always got, "Not what your did or going to do, what do you feel?"

So, if a person is like me, maybe the incoming information is being processed the same way.


_________________
Diagnosed April 14, 2016
ASD Level 1 without intellectual impairments.

RAADS-R -- 213.3
FQ -- 18.7
EQ -- 13
Aspie Quiz -- 186 out of 200
AQ: 42
AQ-10: 8.8


Tahitiii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2008
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,214
Location: USA

09 Apr 2016, 4:54 pm

I'd rather see some research into why the "normal" people in western culture insist on looking into each other's eyes. I'm sure it has something to do with aggression.
Also, why do modern people look right into the camera? They didn't in the distant past. They always looked away.
I don't believe it's natural for anyone, but forced from an early age on those who are more malleable.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

09 Apr 2016, 5:51 pm

Tahitiii wrote:
I'd rather see some research into why the "normal" people in western culture insist on looking into each other's eyes. I'm sure it has something to do with aggression.
Also, why do modern people look right into the camera? They didn't in the distant past. They always looked away.
I don't believe it's natural for anyone, but forced from an early age on those who are more malleable.


They didn't HAVE cameras in "the distant past".

Photography has only existed since the 1850's, and it wasnt accessible to the masses until around 1900.



Tahitiii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2008
Age: 69
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,214
Location: USA

09 Apr 2016, 6:40 pm

1850 and 1900 are pretty distant. If you look at old photos, they are usually looking away.
Anyway, the point is that I don't believe it's natural at all.
And it is considered aggressive or disrespectful in many cultures.



Edenthiel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2014
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,820
Location: S.F Bay Area

09 Apr 2016, 7:00 pm

Tahitiii wrote:
1850 and 1900 are pretty distant. If you look at old photos, they are usually looking away.
Anyway, the point is that I don't believe it's natural at all.
And it is considered aggressive or disrespectful in many cultures.


Part of the reason for that were the insanely long exposure times needed. If they were to look at the camera but move their eyes over a fifteen minute daguerreotype exposure, they'd look...freaky, as the iris & pupil would disappear from the motion blur. Far easier for the photographer to tell them to look off to the side & then lock them in that pose with a metal head clamp.


_________________
“For small creatures such as we the vastness is bearable only through love.”
―Carl Sagan


CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 117,804
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love

09 Apr 2016, 8:00 pm

I'd hardly call that cutting edge research.


_________________
The Family Enigma