Callista wrote:
Not that it can't be a bit uncomfortable to be in between like that, with autistic traits but without disability. Sure, it makes you a good interpreter from one group to the other, but it can mean you don't quite fit in with either. If that's not your experience, if you actually fit in just fine, then you're lucky, but I can imagine it would be easy to feel awkward in the middle between autistic and not.
[Replace "He" with whatever gender pronoun is appropriate.]
But, yes, I do get told that I can't be autistic because I'm too "intelligent"/friendly (I'm not exactly "outgoing", per say, but I'll carry on a conversation if someone initiate one)/not having a severe meltdown at the moment that the topic is being brought up (though, to be fair, my actually being or not being autistic has never been fully resolved in the form of an official, paperwork diagnosis, though I've been told by various professionals that I "seem to have enough symptoms to qualify as having an autistic spectrum disorder"). Regardless of where one may or may not fall on the paperwork side of things, people really need to be careful and as tactful as possible when suggesting that someone is not a label that they identify with.
[Edit: although, come to think of it, Callista is correct often enough to deserve her own Morgan Freeman meme:
]
_________________
I am not a textbook case of any particular disorder; I am an abstract, poetic portrayal of neurovariance with which much artistic license was taken.