Are any of you Savants? If so, what type/skill?

Post Reply New Topic

I have an Eidetic (Photographic) Memory, as apparent by my signature

I've got the detail-focused processing thing in spades, which is mooted as the cause of savant syndrome, but I wouldn't quite call myself a savant. I just do impressive technical things sometimes, like when I was much younger I made a multi-track tape recorder from old domestic machines without any formal education in electronics. I became increasingly wary of my nerdy skills taking me away from a "proper" life, like the Beatles' "Nowhere Man," and I was afraid of ending up lonely like him, so ever since then I've tempered myself and tried my best to be more of a rounded person.

Wow, that's awesome what you did making the tape recorder without any education in electronics. I've discovered that my specialised non-Savant skill is coding. I seem to be able to just naturally pick up any language after learning the basics, and can even simulate/plan a program in my head without having to write anything down, it simply just comes to me and makes sense. I have a formal education in it now, and am still studying it, but I taught myself how to program in HTML/CSS/JavaScript, jQuery, and Android solely on my own, Vanilla Java was taught at my university. I also now know basic OpenGL, PHP, and C++, those three were/are also being taught at my university.

Yes. I work in law and my skill is in the memorization of legislation, case law or otherwise. My memory is photographic and I quote numerous parts of legislation or case law from memory.

Nice. I think my photographic memory is what enables me to simulate/plan code in my head without writing anything down. I can just simply visualise the code (or it's actually more like pseudo-code which I visualise, as I ignore any irrelevant attributes like proper variable names, as those come up when you actually write the code), and then use my knowledge of the language to essentially read through said visualised code in my head and analyse what will and won't work in it.

I'm a very artistic and creative person.

Welcome to Wrong Planet.

Are you aware of our compatriot Nigel Richards? He has disclosed AS and appears to have extreme savant abilities for lexicology:

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/new ... d=11485116

To win the French scrabble national championship as he did last year, never having studied nor spoken French until weeks before entering it is an extraordinary achievement and instance of AS memory savantism applied to language.

Google his name if he interests you, there are many links and articles about him and his career as a champion Scrabble Player

I would not call myself a savant at all, but I do have disproportionately strong verbal skills - especially in writing. I'm only average (at best) with respect to most other skills.

I can draw photo-realistically, from life, it's easy for me. But I usually don't because I think that style is boring.

Personally I wouldn't class having an eidetic memory as being a savant, I'd class it as...well...having an eidetic memory

Thanks, I should admit they taught me a tiny bit at school in physics, but nothing about how audio circuits worked. And it took me a long time to suss it all out. Compared to your photographic memory and computing skills, my Aspie super-powers aren't that impressive.

It's classed as a savant skill, so I think it's up to personal preference really.

I think eidetic memory is quite common in our world, still it's something that normal people don't understand.

When i tell NT's that i can visualize things in my head, i can "see things" as if it was almost like watching a movie, i can think of things and rotate them around (if i know what they look like in 3D), they are gobsmacked and wonder what planet i come from.

From what I've read, it's not common at all. The statistics I found said that roughly 2-10% of children have it, and that it's almost non-existent in adults. For the general population, not as certain about those statistics, but the estimates I have seen said between 1-2%, which is actually quite a lot when you consider that's 1-2% of several billion people, but of still makes it very rare.

If those percentages are actual (rather than a research artifact from sampling or other methodological errors) then it would be interesting to know what proportion of the 2%-10% are AS people, and what proportion are neurotypical or other. If for example the 2%-10% were found to be predominantly AS subjects, that would suggest a more nuanced approach to research might reveal very different and more informative results. We can't and don't know if this neurotypical/neuroatypical difference is real or relevant at present, (as far as I know no such research has been done in any convincing way).

I wasn't privy to my test results as child, but later testing I did indicated a very high IQ, eidetic memory and some sort of extreme pattern recognition abilities. Abstract, visual, temporal, spatial, logical, and auditory, IIR. Works nicely for playing with large, messy data sets and reshaping them to extract meaning, which is what I find myself doing to make a living. It's all fairly ironic since I also have things like timing-based audio processing disorders and a degree of face blindness among other sensory processing issues.