ArielsSong wrote:
If my child turned out to be autistic, she would get all of the accommodations required to make her life happy and comfortable, because that would be more important to me than raising her on that normal playing field. Again, rightly or wrongly. She may grow up and wish I'd just raised her normal. There's no right answer, I don't think.
We're facing that dilemma with my 9-year-old nephew. My parents and I (knowing what to look for) have always seen strong autism traits in him, but his parents prefer to turn a blind eye to it. Now he's at the point where teachers are noting his struggles in the classroom, but not yet wanting to bring up the dreaded 'A-word'.
Even in today's world, with much more awareness of autism, there is a reluctance to stigmatize a child with a psychiatric label, when there is still a hope that 'maybe he'll be okay if we just don't say anything'. That's basically how it was for me as a child, and while I
barely managed school with lots of support from parents and teachers, I never managed to make the transition to adult life, and was unable to cope with the pressures of the 'real world'.
There are some who would prefer to define autism as a condition that is glaringly obvious to casual observers. But psychologists currently define it as a broader spectrum of symptoms, not necessarily obvious and requiring careful diagnosis. And until they change their stance on that, I think we need to accept that definition.
As for 'elitism', policing, gatekeeping, etc... Sometimes I just have to laugh, that 'only a professional can diagnose autism' - meaning it's
not obvious - yet simultaneously, if it's not obvious, you don't have it. I've come to accept that ignorant attitudes abound - in the real world, and here on WP - but there are also many people who
do understand the issues faced by adults on the spectrum, and I'm grateful for that.