Neurotypical Peers Less Willing to Interact with Autistics

Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 

Amaltheia
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 154
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

07 Feb 2017, 1:28 am

New paper in Nature:

Quote:
Abstract

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), including those who otherwise require less support, face severe difficulties in everyday social interactions. Research in this area has primarily focused on identifying the cognitive and neurological differences that contribute to these social impairments, but social interaction by definition involves more than one person and social difficulties may arise not just from people with ASD themselves, but also from the perceptions, judgments, and social decisions made by those around them. Here, across three studies, we find that first impressions of individuals with ASD made from thin slices of real-world social behavior by typically-developing observers are not only far less favorable across a range of trait judgments compared to controls, but also are associated with reduced intentions to pursue social interaction. These patterns are remarkably robust, occur within seconds, do not change with increased exposure, and persist across both child and adult age groups. However, these biases disappear when impressions are based on conversational content lacking audio-visual cues, suggesting that style, not substance, drives negative impressions of ASD. Collectively, these findings advocate for a broader perspective of social difficulties in ASD that considers both the individual’s impairments and the biases of potential social partners.


Link: Neurotypical Peers are Less Willing to Interact with Those with Autism based on Thin Slice Judgments

Apparently, regular folk tend to automatically form negative judgements of those with autism and so have less interest in interacting with, leading to autistics having less practice in social interaction and so being less skilled in it.

To which, I must admit, my immediate response was: well, duh!

Still, it's nice to see science catching up and confirming something I thought was self-evident.



whatamievendoing
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2016
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,336
Location: Finland

07 Feb 2017, 3:34 am

Science: confirming the obvious since the last turn of the millennium.


_________________
“They laugh at me because I'm different; I laugh at them because they're all the same.”
― Kurt Cobain


Kiprobalhato
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Age: 27
Gender: Female
Posts: 29,119
Location: מתחת לעננים

07 Feb 2017, 4:05 am

interesting. i didn't know Nature published human studies.


_________________
הייתי צוללת עכשיו למים
הכי, הכי עמוקים
לא לשמוע כלום
לא לדעת כלום
וזה הכל אהובי, זה הכל.


CharityGoodyGrace
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Nov 2014
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,124

07 Feb 2017, 4:06 am

NOT ALL OF US ARE THE SAME WAY!! ! That magazine is assuming, which I hate.

But for those of us that are socially like that, I'll say that it's a natural and logical consequence of being a minority, of having a different style... a different style of communication.

It's like disliking someone because you don't like the color of their skin. Senseless.



Amaltheia
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 154
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

07 Feb 2017, 5:42 am

CharityGoodyGrace wrote:
NOT ALL OF US ARE THE SAME WAY!! ! That magazine is assuming, which I hate.


Who is "us"? Autistics? Or neurotypicals?

The paper is about the first impressions neurotypicals form of people — using presentations of matched sets of autistics and neurotypicals to see if there are any differences. These first impressions were based on photographs, short audio recordings, short silent movies, short sound movies, and short written transcripts of what the participants said.

As such, the study is about neurotypicals — who were found to consistently rate the autistic participants as less likeable, less approachable, and more awkward, though not as less intelligent or less trustworthy, interestingly enough. This was the case for every form of presentation except the written transcripts, where there was no noticeable difference between the first impressions formed of the members of the two groups.

They also indicated they were less likely to want to engage in conversation, sit next to, or live next door to the autistic participants.

The authors suggest that this reluctance based on first impressions means that those with autism get less social engagement and, as a consequence, less practice in developing their social skills. This does not seem an unreasonable conclusion.

Do all neurotypicals form similar first impressions? Probably not. But enough of them do that a consistent pattern can be found across three separate studies.

I don't see that the paper is assuming either all neurotypicals or all autistics are the same, so I'm not really sure where your comment is coming from.

I also like the authors' suggestion that more work needs to be done to identify what features the neurotypicals are responding to, since the first impression occurs with still photographs, moving images, sound recordings, and full audio-visual movies. What is it about autistics that triggers this? It can't be the usual things cited — eye contact, obsessive interests, lack of social awareness — since the presentations are not long enough or interactive enough for any of those to become evident.