Page 1 of 1 [ 6 posts ] 

TuesdaysChild
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2017
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 44

09 Feb 2017, 11:25 am

I'm thinking this might be HFA related from what I've read. Does anyone get wrapped up in semantics when talking to or listening to someone speak? I find I spend much of my day tangled in the web that is semantics. If something is phrased in a way that can mean several different things, I'll totally go down the rabbit hole in explaining why it should have been phrased differently to indicate the specific intention of the speaker.

This gets really frustrating in class when the professor directs questions to the class, I can think of ten different possible answers, but I have no idea exactly which one he's looking for. Then he'll say the answer he was looking for and I'm like, then he should have asked it this way. Like he'll ask, what is absolute zero? And I'm thinking....okay....it's O Kelvin.... it's where all movement ceases..... it's -273.15 C..... it's technically theoretical..... And then he's like, it's the lowest possible temperature. How do I know which answer of the dozen or so that are also correct he's precisely looking for?

I keep it to myself in class, but I've been known to go off on a harangue in casual conversation because I'm frustrated that I can't determine exactly what the other person is asking or is trying to say. I even got mad at Neil deGrasse Tyson! I was watching a show he did and at the end he was talking about if people aren't into science, that's okay, but he's personally only interested in objective truth (something close to that). And then he followed that up with, because nature's reality is more amazing than human imagination. He said he only desires objective truth and immediately followed it up with a subjective opinion! $%&$&%! !! ! Which one do you want, Neil? WHICH ONE?!?!?!?

*ahem*

And then I realized I was yelling at my television over pure semantics.


_________________
Like the crackling of thorns under the pot, so is the laughter of fools. ~ Solomon
I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself. ~ D.H. Lawrence


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

09 Feb 2017, 11:45 am

I've gotten into that with others in the debate section of WP. Either end up arguing over a word that was used or an analogy that was used.



NeilM
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2016
Age: 72
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 283
Location: Virginia, USA

09 Feb 2017, 10:35 pm

That happens to me a lot just reading the newspaper. I feel like emailing the person who wrote the story and say if this is what you meant, you should have written it this way. It seems to happen so much tho I've given up and now feel like I'm translating it into what I can understand.

I think too this happens when certain IQs are involved. And I say it is HFA related for sure.


_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 120 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 74 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)

AQ = 38 MBTI = ISTJ Gender = Non-binary
I strive not to perseverate. You can PM me for more info.


Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

09 Feb 2017, 10:46 pm

^ I don't mean to get caught up in semantics, but I think what you're really talking about is pragmatics. :mrgreen:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatics

(Pragmatics is usually what aspies have the greatest difficulty with.)


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!


TuesdaysChild
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2017
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 44

09 Feb 2017, 11:03 pm

Darmok wrote:
^ I don't mean to get caught up in semantics, but I think what you're really talking about is pragmatics. :mrgreen:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatics

(Pragmatics is usually what aspies have the greatest difficulty with.)


Actually.... you're right. Now that I think about it, I tend to use "semantics" as a sort of catch-all for a disagreement of meaning, whether it's meaning of a word or context. But I see you are correct. And the delivery was top notch *tips hat*


_________________
Like the crackling of thorns under the pot, so is the laughter of fools. ~ Solomon
I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself. ~ D.H. Lawrence


Darmok
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,030
Location: New England

10 Feb 2017, 12:45 am

TuesdaysChild wrote:
Darmok wrote:
^ I don't mean to get caught up in semantics, but I think what you're really talking about is pragmatics. :mrgreen:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatics

(Pragmatics is usually what aspies have the greatest difficulty with.)


Actually.... you're right. Now that I think about it, I tend to use "semantics" as a sort of catch-all for a disagreement of meaning, whether it's meaning of a word or context. But I see you are correct. And the delivery was top notch *tips hat*

*bows courteously*


_________________
 
There Are Four Lights!


cron