Unethical “Stem Cell” Therapy for Autism In India?
Neuroskeptic
« The Incredible Lesion-Proof Brain?
Unethical “Stem Cell” Therapy for Autism In India?
By Neuroskeptic | March 17, 2017 4:29 pm
11
I just read a concerning paper about an experimental stem cell treatment for children with autism.
The authors are Himanshu Bansal and colleagues of India. The senior author, Prasad S Koka, is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Stem Cells where the paper appeared, which raises questions about whether the manuscript received a thorough peer review. Koka is actually an author on all five of the research papers published in that issue of the journal. But that’s a minor issue compared to the content of the paper.
Bansal et al. describe a procedure in which they extracted fluid from the bone marrow of each child. This fluid (bone marrow aspirate) was treated in the laboratory to purify the stem cells within, and then injected into the child’s spinal canal. The whole operation took place under general anaesthesia. 10 autistic children aged 4-12 were treated.
I found this pretty shocking. An invasive procedure involving general anaesthesia should only be performed if it’s medically justified – especially in children as young as 4! Bansal et al. provide no scientific explanation for why they thought this treatment was suitable for these patients. They vaguely name “immunological and neural dysregulation” believed to underlie autism as the target of the cells.
For what it’s worth, the results showed a slight improvement in autism symptoms after the treatment. However, there was no control group, so placebo effects are likely, and we’re told that the patients were also given “speech therapy, occupational therapy and psychological intervention” which might account for the benefits.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuro ... M0PD2ekLIU
horse of course
Butterfly
Joined: 24 Feb 2017
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 17
Location: Brisbane, Australia
You left off the last paragraph of the article (or perhaps it was added after you read the article) that mentions the author is affiliated with a firm that sells stem cell therapies. The bloke who published the anti MRR vaccine garbage research was involved with a firm that was going to be selling single alternative vaccines to the MRR one. I'm seeing a pattern here...
I deliberately posted only part of the article as posting full article content is often frowned upon . Link was provided to allow people to see the full article.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Sensory therapy |
29 Oct 2024, 4:00 pm |
Sauna Therapy? |
19 Jan 2025, 3:12 am |
I need therapy but I have no health insurance. |
21 Nov 2024, 8:39 am |
Having Autism |
19 Dec 2024, 12:00 pm |