How do you think "Aspies" fared in prehistorical times?

Page 1 of 1 [ 14 posts ] 

antnego
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2017
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 134

31 Mar 2017, 1:14 am

When humanity was focused simply on trying to survive sabertooth tigers and harsh winters, how do you think neurodiverse folks survived? Any surivival advantages?

I'm thinking yes, because there are still a fair amount of neurodiverse people in the overall population.


_________________
My neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 155 of 200

My neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 82 of 200

I am very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)


ZombieBrideXD
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jan 2013
Age: 27
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,507
Location: Canada

31 Mar 2017, 1:19 am

I think about that too

Temple Grandin always said "it wasnt the guy who was social who invented the spear or the bow and arrow- it was the little autistic guy all alone!"


_________________
Obsessing over Sonic the Hedgehog since 2009
Diagnosed with Aspergers' syndrome in 2012.
Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder Level 1 severity without intellectual disability and without language impairment in 2015.

DA: http://mephilesdark123.deviantart.com


ZombieBrideXD
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jan 2013
Age: 27
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,507
Location: Canada

31 Mar 2017, 1:22 am

"In an ideal world the scientist should find a method to prevent the most severe forms of autism but allow the milder forms to survive. After all, the really social people did not invent the first stone spear. It was probably invented by an Aspie who chipped away at rocks while the other people socialized around the campfire. Without autism traits we might still be living in caves."

Thats the actual qoute from Temple Grandin


_________________
Obsessing over Sonic the Hedgehog since 2009
Diagnosed with Aspergers' syndrome in 2012.
Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder Level 1 severity without intellectual disability and without language impairment in 2015.

DA: http://mephilesdark123.deviantart.com


antnego
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2017
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 134

31 Mar 2017, 1:29 am

I love Temple's list of ideal jobs for Aspies.

In my case, it could've meant early death. At 6 y/o I tried to "unlock" the wall by sticking a matchbox car key in an electrical socket. Thank God it was the negative terminal. My mother promptly noticed what I was doing and stopped me.


_________________
My neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 155 of 200

My neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 82 of 200

I am very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)


Skilpadde
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,019

31 Mar 2017, 12:22 pm

I think it would depend on the aspie.
The good thing would be that we wouldn't rely on other people to give us jobs despite not ticking off their social box.
The possibly bad thing would be skill at making it on your own, a place to take shelter, hunting skills, knowing what is safe to eat (berries, roots etc), making tools. Aspies like me wouldn't die from taking risks, that's for sure, but we might not take enough chances to get food.


_________________
BOLTZ 17/3 2012 - 12/11 2020
Beautiful, sweet, gentle, playful, loyal
simply the best and one of a kind
love you and miss you, dear boy

Stop the wolf kills! https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeact ... 3091429765


Corny
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2017
Age: 25
Gender: Male
Posts: 653
Location: Arkansas

31 Mar 2017, 12:46 pm

I thought Autism and Aspergers was pretty new. Like people didn't have it till less than 100 years ago. But I never got why it's so new of a thing. I thought since humans came into existence thousands of years ago. They're were always awkward people with social problems.



LaetiBlabla
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 31 Dec 2015
Posts: 981
Location: Earth

31 Mar 2017, 1:08 pm

Autistics were excluded, just like now, they were sitting somewhere alone in the cold, the head going forward and backwards, hitting stones together, and one day, bang, fire appeared.



svaughan
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 26 Oct 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 113

31 Mar 2017, 1:24 pm

I imagine confident Aspies would have made outstanding hunters and even leaders. Sensory issues would have been very different back then too.



feral botanist
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Jul 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 881
Location: in the dry land

31 Mar 2017, 1:33 pm

I am reading EO Wilsons "Social Conquest"; if we look to chimpanzees, most solitary males will likely get killed by competing bands, while solitary females are left alone, unless the have an infant, in which case the infant is eaten by the competing band.

I dont think many AS males would have made it to adulthood.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

31 Mar 2017, 2:05 pm

Probably fairly well if they had a useful skill---like being an especially excellent toolmaker who makes especially sharp blades with their tools.

If they had artistic skills, they were either made shaman, or played some "spiritual-religious" role. I would bet that many of the cave artists had Aspie/artistic traits.

One HAD to be an Aspie, as far as I'm concerned, if they were, somehow, able to create edible food out of wild grains. It took lots of trial and error to accomplish this. This probably was done by a person who had that grain, and sedentary life in general, as a "special interest." That person would have had that special "focus" which Aspie/autistics have today.

If this sort of scenario presented itself, they were probably exempt from the hunt.

Though...if they could hunt too----that would have been even better!



svaughan
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 26 Oct 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 113

31 Mar 2017, 2:08 pm

feral botanist wrote:
I am reading EO Wilsons "Social Conquest"; if we look to chimpanzees, most solitary males will likely get killed by competing bands, while solitary females are left alone, unless the have an infant, in which case the infant is eaten by the competing band.

I dont think many AS males would have made it to adulthood.


The modern dsy equivalent is bullying in school then.



feral botanist
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 5 Jul 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 881
Location: in the dry land

31 Mar 2017, 2:53 pm

svaughan wrote:
feral botanist wrote:
I am reading EO Wilsons "Social Conquest"; if we look to chimpanzees, most solitary males will likely get killed by competing bands, while solitary females are left alone, unless the have an infant, in which case the infant is eaten by the competing band.

I dont think many AS males would have made it to adulthood.


The modern dsy equivalent is bullying in school then.


Yes, in the chapter on tribalism. He makes the case that it is likely a genetic predisposition to form groups, just look at spectator sports.

Somehow I am missiing that trait. I do not form loyalties to groups, never have. I form intense loyalties to people.

Back to the topic, if ND were often wander solitarily, like I do, they would have a much greater chance of being killed by the competing bands.



Marybird
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Apr 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,818

31 Mar 2017, 6:02 pm

antnego wrote:
When humanity was focused simply on trying to survive sabertooth tigers and harsh winters, how do you think neurodiverse folks survived? Any surivival advantages?

I'm thinking yes, because there are still a fair amount of neurodiverse people in the overall population.


There were no public schools. every one stayed with their family, tribe, or clan and and learned from them.
Everyone was a unique individual who was known from birth.
There was no concept of neurodiverse. Everyone did what they were capable of. Disabled people were cared for and loved.
No one had to go out into a world of strangers and fill out job applications and compete with other strangers for a right to earn a living and survive.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,490
Location: Long Island, New York

31 Mar 2017, 8:43 pm

Corny wrote:
I thought Autism and Aspergers was pretty new. Like people didn't have it till less than 100 years ago. But I never got why it's so new of a thing. I thought since humans came into existence thousands of years ago. They're were always awkward people with social problems.


People did not get labeled wth Autism until the mid 20th century and Aspergers until the late 20th century. That does not mean it did not exist. Autism experts have named certain people from hundreds of years ago as having numerous autistic traits.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman