Chichikov wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
I don't think it's a ridiculous suggestion.
I've explained why it is over my last few posts.
replying: "it's just ridiculous." Isn't an explanation, it's merely an opinion, and to be honest it's barely a sentence.
Chichikov wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
You called me a weak addict.
If you're a smoker then you are.
If you'd bothered to read his posts, he already said he didn't smoke tobacco, only weed, of which even the DEA agrees is not physically addicting.
Chichikov wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Not everyone who smokes is a nicotine addict
That's just something you tell yourself.
It's true, not every that smokes ends up being a pack a day smoker, I know a few people that will have a smoke when they're at the bar here and there, but don't smoke anywhere else.
Chichikov wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
So are you saying if I get upset about something that's not true the problem is mine not the accusers
Straw-man argument, the point is that it *is* true.
Again, that's not an argument, that's an opinion, at least without evidence cited. Also putting an asterisk around the operative verb does not magically make it factual, it merely points out laziness in citing evidence for the claim.
Chichikov wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Where have I blamed anything bad on ASD?
Suggesting that smoking is a stim is pretty much that.
The OP never claimed it was, the OP merely asked others if it was a stim for them.