HistoryGal wrote:
Theoretically you should be able to count on your friends to be there for you since you have been there for them in crucial times.
I'm suggested you don't anticipate the same response. They often see us as expendable. Something to be used and discarded much like a can of soda. You drink it and throw out the can.
Big tip off to these nasty users is that they only ring you up WHEN they want something. They don't have time for YOU in your time of need.
I certainly relate to this. I think this is a product of a couple of things. Firstly, autistic folks tend to be quite loyal - more so than the average person. I've mistakenly believed with a number of friends before that they felt the same loyalty as I did, after I stuck with them through their challenges with unemployment, divorces, etc. only to have them blow me off when I was seriously ill or in other need. I think that as autistics, we may have some difficulty putting ourselves in others' shoes in a cognitive way, but we're often more sensitive to others' emotions than the average person. Additionally, neurotypical people are often motivated to act loyally, be patient, tell convenient social 'white' lies, or be generous out of a desire to avoid unpleasant confrontation and/or social shaming or 'loss of face'. When 'the markers are called in', they weigh how much it matters to them and realize that being autistic we're unlikely to successfully confront them emotionally and we're not socially relevant or connected enough to cause much shame. I'm not sure how conscious NTs are of what they're doing - it might be more instinctual. And there's a social 'pecking order' that exists between people that is often invisible to autistics, but of which we're usually on the lower end, and which dictates that the higher-up person may be charitable and return a favor, but that it's not an expected thing. I'm often motivated by quid-pro-quo thinking and I get offended or hurt when people I thought were friends don't return kindness. I don't think it's even consciously malicious on their part - it's more like it's not relevant enough.