It literally said, as opposed to every other disability.
And you still need to explain the latter to me even though I had not thought of that specifically until you said it. But now that you have mentioned it, yeah, please explain it. I have blind people in my family. I also have friends who are blind and they are much more functional than I am and always have been. They have always been more functional than I ever have been or will ever be. They finished school with high degrees and have very good jobs.
Many of the people I know who are blind, some are completely blind and others are legally blind in various degrees, do not consider themselves particularly impaired especially if they have been blind from birth or from early childhood. Nor do many of them have all of the different multiples of issues that I have with Autism. I cannot manage to keep work or gainful employ because of the multiple issues that I have which can severely impair me on a daily basis even though I am considered a very high functioning Autistic. In 15 years, I have never been able to keep any job, I have had about 53, and I have never in my life made more than $9000 in one year and that was only one year because I was paid a high wage for my job. But that job did not even last a year because I could not keep it due to Autistic reasons. The other years I worked, I never managed to make more than $3000. I was told by a judge that I cannot be disabled because one year in my entire life I managed to make $9000 so therefore I cannot be disabled and I should be able to support myself. If the cutoff were the same that is is for a blind person, I would have been able to be declared disabled.
So please explain to me why the monetary cutoff amount for me to be considered disabled is so much less than it is for a blind person.
_________________
"I'm bad and that's good. I'll never be good and that's not bad. There's no one I'd rather be than me."
Wreck It Ralph