According to the closest person I have for a mentor, she said something in the lines (and translations) of;
"The wellbeing of the disabled isn't (seen) as a worthy investment. The (benefits) doesn't give anything back in return, and it isn't a (necessary requirement to keep livelihood going). So (some?people) would think it's unfair, and it's a waste of resources."
This is her take on what the government and what people may think.
I think it's not just autistics, but just about any disability there is.
No surprises if people pointed fingers on the family or caretaker instead of the disabled relative or ward.
Maybe even some humanitarian yet unnecessary stuff (half of it is run on the concept of pity), considering that I come from a poor country.
From where I live, many people couldn't get a job -- and it's not because they're disabled or lazy, even achieving higher education and migrating didn't saved them from being unemployed or underemployed without any form of benefits.
If a country like the US complains about those stuff, then a country like mine would've... Hmm, I dunno the right term for it, but it could be worse. Corruption is already bad here as it is for decades now, and I'm getting offtopic if I go any further.