This part of the article made me laugh; it's like something Foucault would write:
Quote:
Before modernity, affairs pertaining to the interior were not considered especially distinct from those of the world outside.
What does he think was happening in all those Shakespeare plays?
Or this part (bold mine):
Quote:
Proust who has observed, recast and reinterpreted the city in forms that are significant to him, following his deliberate but subjective attentions, through the scenes, artifacts and fictions of its inhabitants.
This is just the subjective experience, which we all have since we can only be ourselves. Everyone does this. It doesn't need a name like "interiority."