jimmy m wrote:
Dear_one wrote:
I would not bring a child into a world that is headed for chaos.
The world is always headed for chaos. For thousands of years, chaos is always right around the corner.
Through former times, children were unavoidably in peril from disease and other dangers, but their numbers and abilities were almost no danger to the future, except for making deserts and the work of rare warlords. Now, humans and domestic animals outweigh all the wild animals combined about 10:1 and there are daily extinctions from loss of habitat to rising human populations. Our machines make it far easier to invade wilderness, and our demands for more stuff make it "necessary." Our coming chaos is not just political, but climactic. We have had natural disasters before, but now we can't move to a safe area - the whole world is changing rapidly.
I may have some good genes for the coming age, but with over seven billion other humans, I assume that there's enough diversity, and try to produce something society needs more than another mouth to feed.
To me, it seems pretty basic that parents want a better life for their children, so to prepare, I decided I'd have to be able to support them without cutting into their natural inheritance. That is very difficult to do in this economy, and success would probably make the child a social outcast anyway.