There Is A Kind Of Man That Is A 'Woman Killer'

Page 1 of 1 [ 12 posts ] 

SaveFerris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,762
Location: UK

05 May 2019, 5:38 pm

Just putting it out there.

It's factually correct and not misandrist to say it.

And I would not remove this thread if anyone complained about it being misandry.


_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1

Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard


blackicmenace
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2016
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,465
Location: Sagittarius A

05 May 2019, 5:51 pm

You are correct sir.

Mod Edit:

I have changed the title since this comment so this may not be blackicmenace current feelings.

Don't jump on him , direct your venomous hate towards me.


_________________
Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.” ― Bertrand Russell


TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 29,937
Location: Hell

05 May 2019, 5:55 pm

This discussion would be closer to the mark if you were to say “there is a type of man that is a ’womankiller’” (such a label implies that the person’s sole role is harming or killing women) which would surely conjure up images in one’s mind of a physically abusive male. Since men are much more likely to be physically abusive than women and that misogyny continues to be such an ongoing problem in situations regarding domestic violence (especially physical and sexual abuse), linguistic comparisons are hardly accurate.

This isn’t to say that woman aren’t abusive but in the context of the OP there really is no comparison to the real problems (statistically) that women face in physically abusive scenarios.

I would have no qualms with a post discussing toxic people, but the word “Mankiller” for the problems listed is not appropriate.

Also, in the OP, referring to women as coin-operated entertainment systems objectifies women in a way that many on this site wouldn’t be comfortable with, especially if they’ve dealt with serious abuses (not just toxic behavior) themselves.



blackicmenace
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Nov 2016
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,465
Location: Sagittarius A

05 May 2019, 5:56 pm

I see no need to don my armor Sir Ferret.


_________________
Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.” ― Bertrand Russell


SaveFerris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,762
Location: UK

05 May 2019, 6:04 pm

Twilightprincess wrote:
This discussion would be closer to the mark if you were to say “there is a type of man that is a ’womankiller’” (such a label implies that the person’s sole role is harming or killing women) which would surely conjure up images in one’s mind of a physically abusive male. Since men are much more likely to be physically abusive than women and that misogyny continues to be such an ongoing problem in situations regarding domestic violence (especially physical and sexual abuse), linguistic comparisons are hardly accurate.

This isn’t to say that woman aren’t abusive but in the context of the OP there really is no comparison to the real problems (statistically) that women face in physically abusive scenarios.

I would have no qualms with a post discussing toxic people, but the word “Mankiller” for the problems listed is not appropriate.

Also, in the OP, referring to women as coin-operated entertainment systems objectifies women in a way that many on this site wouldn’t be comfortable with, especially if they’ve dealt with serious abuses (not just toxic behavior) themselves.


I changed the title so it is closer to the mark for you , it is still factually correct and not misandry to say it.

The other issues you have are not misogyny.


_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1

Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard


TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 29,937
Location: Hell

05 May 2019, 6:07 pm

SaveFerris wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
This discussion would be closer to the mark if you were to say “there is a type of man that is a ’womankiller’” (such a label implies that the person’s sole role is harming or killing women) which would surely conjure up images in one’s mind of a physically abusive male. Since men are much more likely to be physically abusive than women and that misogyny continues to be such an ongoing problem in situations regarding domestic violence (especially physical and sexual abuse), linguistic comparisons are hardly accurate.

This isn’t to say that woman aren’t abusive but in the context of the OP there really is no comparison to the real problems (statistically) that women face in physically abusive scenarios.

I would have no qualms with a post discussing toxic people, but the word “Mankiller” for the problems listed is not appropriate.

Also, in the OP, referring to women as coin-operated entertainment systems objectifies women in a way that many on this site wouldn’t be comfortable with, especially if they’ve dealt with serious abuses (not just toxic behavior) themselves.


I changed the title so it is closer to the mark for you , it is still factually correct and not misandry to say it.

The other issues you have are not misogyny.


How is objectifying women by calling them coin-operated entertainment systems not misogynistic?



BeaArthur
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Aug 2015
Posts: 5,798

05 May 2019, 6:09 pm

There's a term that might cause confusion: ladykiller.

Ladykiller does not imply any outright violence. It typically applies to a man who romances one woman after another, serially dumping the current one for a future one, or even having a stable of several, all in play at one time.

Your thread is obviously written to parallel "There is a kind of woman that is a man killer" and I think it means something different than the "ladykiller" word. You are implying not merely use-and-discard, but abuse (mentally, emotionally, financially, and/or physically).

I just wanted to make the distinction.


_________________
A finger in every pie.


BeaArthur
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Aug 2015
Posts: 5,798

05 May 2019, 6:11 pm

Coin operated entertainment systems? I did not see that! Ferris, did you go back and edit it out of your OP?


_________________
A finger in every pie.


TwilightPrincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 29,937
Location: Hell

05 May 2019, 6:13 pm

BeaArthur wrote:
Coin operated entertainment systems? I did not see that! Ferris, did you go back and edit it out of your OP?


It wasn’t in his post but in the post he’s referencing that apparently isn’t misogynistic. :roll:



SaveFerris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,762
Location: UK

05 May 2019, 6:22 pm

BeaArthur wrote:
Coin operated entertainment systems? I did not see that! Ferris, did you go back and edit it out of your OP?


Nah , it was in this post viewtopic.php?f=3&t=375864#p8225559 which I edited with the OP's watered down version.


_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1

Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard


SaveFerris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,762
Location: UK

05 May 2019, 6:25 pm

Twilightprincess wrote:
SaveFerris wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
This discussion would be closer to the mark if you were to say “there is a type of man that is a ’womankiller’” (such a label implies that the person’s sole role is harming or killing women) which would surely conjure up images in one’s mind of a physically abusive male. Since men are much more likely to be physically abusive than women and that misogyny continues to be such an ongoing problem in situations regarding domestic violence (especially physical and sexual abuse), linguistic comparisons are hardly accurate.

This isn’t to say that woman aren’t abusive but in the context of the OP there really is no comparison to the real problems (statistically) that women face in physically abusive scenarios.

I would have no qualms with a post discussing toxic people, but the word “Mankiller” for the problems listed is not appropriate.

Also, in the OP, referring to women as coin-operated entertainment systems objectifies women in a way that many on this site wouldn’t be comfortable with, especially if they’ve dealt with serious abuses (not just toxic behavior) themselves.


I changed the title so it is closer to the mark for you , it is still factually correct and not misandry to say it.

The other issues you have are not misogyny.


How is objectifying women by calling them coin-operated entertainment systems not misogynistic?


He called one woman that. The woman that made two men kill themselves if you believe the story.

Coin operated is also slang for a whore, prostitute ( sex worker if you're watching :wink: ) or any person that accepts money , drugs or favours for sex . It is not feminine terminology , there are many coin operated entertainment systems who are men and I'm guessing any gender that exist.


_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1

Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard


jifmam j jasond
Blue Jay
Blue Jay

Joined: 25 Apr 2019
Age: 68
Posts: 84
Location: prc

05 May 2019, 7:54 pm

I think people are missing the central point, perhaps lost in the de-nastified version!
This person was not really a woman, but a sociopath emulating one with great skill for reasons of personal revenge because of sexual abuse in child hood by a male family member("pestered" = molestation/rape).
"I said "man-killer" because she caused death.
Perhaps I should make the original avaiiable by PM.
And realize it was written in a seizure of rage and pain.
and besides, the original is an illustration of aspie anger. Examine the subtext under lying this thing.
any takers?
or publish in the "rant"or "adult" sections.
Also the sanitized version is an act of satire on the original.
"coin operated entertainment system "=
ahhh, I think it should be published intact to adult users, embellished with appropriate warnings, because it really i a fine piece of overwrought invective.
Mod willing, of course. long furry mammal approved.