madbutnotmad wrote:
To be honest, I think the alternative isn't much better. In a world of inequality, there are often innocent victims.
The way the world presently works, works for some but if you were to travel to each country in the world and got every nations story objectively, you would realise that the present system doesn't work particularly well for quiet a few people either. I think that the statistics of how many people who live below the poverty line, would shock most people if they ever stepped outside their 1st world comfortable bubble.
11 facts about Global Poverty I also note that i didn't mention utopia. I just think that the way the world works is sadistic and cruel, and ethically wrong.
Can't read the site because of our benevolent EU overlords. But as far as I know, aggregate poverty is going down worldwide, as a consequence of things like free trade and the spread of industrialization. Countries like India and Brazil have huge populations of poor people,. but they're also some of the worlds top polluters owing to a rapidly growing industry that is not yet on the level of first world countries. As industrialization increases, poverty goes down. And as the industry refines, pollution goes down.
Quote:
Personally, i think that the human race, if able to approach such things as government in a mature manner, with the aim of creating a real unified world for the aim of eradicating poverty and other issues, but also to maximise the efficiency of supplying resources etc.
This is utopian thinking, whether you say the word utopia or not.
Fact is, of you compare the flawed present to a hypothetical ideal future such as the one you presented, then any amount of bloodshed is justified because the idea, however unreachable, will always purport to eventually have saved enough future lives to justify the bodycount.
madbutnotmad wrote:
Magna wrote:
What would the global retirement age be and how would retirement benefits be paid?
if the robots and AI's take over, we all will be out of work. Although short term, i can't see the wealth supremacists who own the universe doing away with capitalism, free market or currency.
Although, in theory it could happen.
The world will become increasingly automated, yes. But the scifi world where the AI and the robots take over completely is quite distant to say the least, if at all even feasable.
And Is that a whiff of communism I smell? You're not going to get rid of poverty by abolishing currency.
Quote:
It would be possible to achieve a unified global rulership that is still democratic in nature.
It really wouldn't. One of the things I particularly don't like about the EU is that power should never be concentrated that far away from those that are being governed. If the laws I have to abide by were created in Stockholm, that's three hours away by train. I could go theere and hold them to account for what they're doing. I have no chance of going to Brussels to protest laws I nevertheless have to follow. So, where would you place a global government so as to be accessible to the entire world?
_________________
I'm bored out of my skull, let's play a different game. Let's pay a visit down below and cast the world in flame.