magz wrote:
I see a different issue with DSM the study proved useless.
DSM diagnoses are based on very superficial symptoms, completely lacking any understanding of underlying mechanisms.
It's like you had a medical textbook with a diagnosis of "knee pain". Knees are complex systems that can get wrong in multiple different ways, each of them resulting in knee pain but each of them requiring completely different treatment. If the diagnostic manual had only one diagnosis of "knee pain", it would be virtually useless for giving the patient any useful help.
That's how I see the current DSM standard.
I understand
the original article comes to a bit similar conclusion.
Thank you for putting into words my exact thoughts on this.
I actually think this applies to medical health as well as psychology. So many diagnosis are too vague. Bronchitis just means 'lung disease'. It doesn't not specify a difference between viral, bacterial, and environmental causes, for example.
To be fair, I think these problems are very complex, and clumping symptoms together is a quick, brute force method of getting some sort of starting point.