AngelL wrote:
Dear_one wrote:
Currently, a complex system of laws is not working. I'm in favour of a simple system that does.
Well said.
There is a quote that I have spent a fair amount of time searching for to no avail, but I'll paraphrase it here. It's a quote from one of the United States founders and framers of their Constitution:
'When the law becomes so complex that the common man can't determine if he is breaking the law or not, the common man with lose respect for the law.'
Sometimes, people complain about new regulations that are a necessary response to more people sharing the same space. Some are just unfair to various groups without looking obvious about it. Sometimes a complex law is hard to read and understand. Sometimes, it is more often seen to be ignored, so it does not seem valid. Sometimes, it is only applied to harass people selectively, producing "a government of men, not laws." However, that is not my major concern.
I think that laws to fix problems usually fail because psychopaths are so nimble and unpredictable. To rein them in, we need a much bigger and better net, including a ban on private wealth. With the invention of the 'net, all of patent and copyright law became obsolete. It no longer encourages innovation; it just feeds an army of lawyers. We could let all the creative people share ideas freely to collaborate, and recognize the copied and shared innovations with small sums from the public purse. Crowd funding has replaced the only social function of millionaires.