Page 1 of 2 [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

dalhousie12
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,059
Location: A frozen baron wasteland, me and my friend tuk have to watch out for flying frozen hockey pucks Eh!

29 Jul 2007, 4:06 pm

Ive tried reading the wikipedia article on theory of mind but don't really understand what it is about. Is there any threads on wrong planet about theory of mind? I haven't been able to find any yet, still need to do more research! If anybody knows of any threads, it would be greatly appreicated if you could post some replies with the links.

thanks



Asparval
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 847
Location: UK

29 Jul 2007, 4:30 pm

It is the ability to be aware of other's minds as seperate to your own and also to be able to see yourself ojectively.

It is an ability that we are supposed to lack but in reality most adults on the spectrum have theory of mind at some level.

With me, I can tend to forget that other people's minds are different from mine when it comes to passing on information. I have often assumed that people know what I know simply by virtue of the fact that it is in my mind; I assume that, because I know something others must too (they don't ~ you have to tell them).

This could be seen as a slight impairment in 'Theory of Mind'



richardbenson
Xfractor Card #351
Xfractor Card #351

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,553
Location: Leave only a footprint behind

29 Jul 2007, 4:37 pm

i think its your minds eyes, apparently i dont have one so i talk to myself :D


_________________
Winds of clarity. a universal understanding come and go, I've seen though the Darkness to understand the bounty of Light


0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

29 Jul 2007, 4:43 pm

Simply it a theory that tries to explain why we have difficulty understanding and being understood by NT. ToM is something that NTs are supposed to have and were more lacking in.

In a 'lower functioning' autie it is supposed to be fairly common that if they do something say break a vase that they would not be aware they need to tell somebody about it, because they don't have the concept that anyone wouldn't already know. That is exaggerated of cause. One example that is often used to illustrate it is some thing like: Sally and Bob both have two boxes and sally has her favourite ball, which she puts away in her box. Sally leaves to do something else. Bob really wants sally's ball so he takes it and puts it in his box. The question is where would should sally look for her ball? Well the right answer is in her own box. Well that is a bit dumb because you know it is in Bobs box. It is irrelevant whether she knows; she still needs to look in Bob's box. So I probably confused you some more lol. But I am aware that others don’t know what I’m thinking when I actually consciously think about it, but you’ll be surprised how often I think people know or I’ve already told them when I merely thought about it myself. One school report it said in my stories I wrote, I assumed that people were following my train of thought and I got angry when the teacher said it didn't make sense. Anyway it also boils down to the fact that we are less aware of what make others tick and what they know, or even not as focused as we should on it. Consequently we misread people, or upset them sometimes.



TheMachine1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jun 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,011
Location: 9099 will be my last post...what the hell 9011 will be.

29 Jul 2007, 4:50 pm

Sounds like a good name for a rock band "Theory of Mind".



2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,242

29 Jul 2007, 5:12 pm

Asparval wrote:
It is the ability to be aware of other's minds as seperate to your own and also to be able to see yourself ojectively.

It is an ability that we are supposed to lack but in reality most adults on the spectrum have theory of mind at some level.

With me, I can tend to forget that other people's minds are different from mine when it comes to passing on information. I have often assumed that people know what I know simply by virtue of the fact that it is in my mind; I assume that, because I know something others must too (they don't ~ you have to tell them).

This could be seen as a slight impairment in 'Theory of Mind'


GEE, I ALWAYS looked at myself objectively. A lot of NTs look at EVERYTHING subjectively. THAT is the ONE real reason the US and possibly the world, is as it is. SO MANY want reality colored to benefit THEM, EVEN at the expense of all else.

With your statement about assuming other people know things you do, I used to weigh things on criteria, and automatically determine the likelyhood. Of course, it often ended up being too generous.

The job I am in now is one I might have thought was minimum wage. It is second nature to me. Yet I get paid a good wage that is FAR higher than the minimum wage, because I know things a lot of others just DON'T.

Still, you HAVE to do that to SOME degree. "Tech support" rarely knows ANYTHING, and they assume I know nothing. Their delaying tactics, and spiels of what they think is relevant are NAUSEATING. If I did that all the time, I would be a pariah! It is better to try to use common language and ramp it up if they are comfortable, or throw in explanations if they aren't.



SeaBright
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2006
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,407
Location: Halfway back

29 Jul 2007, 7:39 pm

85 percent of the rest of the world has one shared theroy.

...
.....
........

And Then There Is You. :twisted:

out in the cold, be damned.
rare token of some inside joke you will never quite get.....but will hypothesize about..
ugly,
alone,
oblivious,
FREE

um...my appologees...the author is not feeling quite......right....more of a left really. really really. no serious. that is what I mean.


_________________
"I'm sorry Katya, my dear, but where we come from, your what's known as a pet; a not quite human novelty. It's why we brought you.... It's nothing to be ashamed of, my dear, but here you are and here you'll sit."


dalhousie12
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,059
Location: A frozen baron wasteland, me and my friend tuk have to watch out for flying frozen hockey pucks Eh!

29 Jul 2007, 7:43 pm

Wow So that is what that means and that makes so much sense now. Now i understand why project managers would tell me to assume my survey assistant knows nothing and tell him what to do. i could never really graspe that concept because i expected the assistant to have a little understanding of surveying and be able to take some initiative to do some things on there own without having to be told everything to do. There was many times i expected them to know what i was thinking and be able to know were i wanted them to go without being told. It lead to many survey assistants not wanting to work with me and most of them eventually quit. They eventually moved me into the office to a plan checking job which became less stressful for me.

Hopefully my personal example proves that i now understand theory of mind.



LabPet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,389
Location: Canada

29 Jul 2007, 8:31 pm

In essence, ToM means, "If I know something, then why don't you?" I am mindblind in a neurotypical world of mind readers, and they know. In Greek the word 'aut' means mind and this is where I live and can only observe outside - I cannot really 'know' another's thought, expression, motive, intent, feelings, etc. I am without pretense; I have no forward thinking - really naive. I find NTs to often be deceptive and I am honest to a fault. NTs tend to insert meaning where it does not exist. I tend to forget another cannot know what I am thinking! I cannot decipher social cues. I interact by choreographed cues and mimicry. I am a high-functioning autistic, certainly, but I am 100% autistic, whereas many, maybe even most, in this forum consider themselves only mildly autistic. I do appreciate and recognize this way of being, but I am not. I am designated as an Aspie only because I am cognitively advanced. I have sensory integration disorder(s) too, but that's separate from the topic of ToM.

There's versions of the ToM test - same principle though. 0_equals_true: It's Sally and Anne with a marble and basket, bowl, respectively! :D same concepts. Remember, dalhousie12, this is precisely why autistics are naturally scientist and artists (re: lack of ToM)! This 'deficit' is not necessarily wrong, just different. However, many do think it's wrong, irrational, immature, etc. Does this help? The concept is not really tangible but with real consequences.


_________________
The ones who say “You can’t” and “You won’t” are probably the ones scared that you will. - Unknown


LabPet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,389
Location: Canada

29 Jul 2007, 8:34 pm

Oh, I forgot: Theory of Mind develops in neurotypical children definitively between the age of 4.5 to 5 years. I guess I was absent that day......


_________________
The ones who say “You can’t” and “You won’t” are probably the ones scared that you will. - Unknown


SeaBright
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2006
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,407
Location: Halfway back

29 Jul 2007, 9:14 pm

:roll:

only .......
you see..
I've been drinking...

and only NTs understand me when I've been drinking...

8O
you are AMAZING!

Of course,
I understood NOTHING you replied....

SPY!

j/k nudge nudge wink wink

I'm glad once again for another WHAT IS THEORY OF OTHER MINDS?

I will one up the question. WHY IS IT theory of other minds, instead of FACT OF OTHER MINDS?

That is the strangest thing I have ever heard in my life.


_________________
"I'm sorry Katya, my dear, but where we come from, your what's known as a pet; a not quite human novelty. It's why we brought you.... It's nothing to be ashamed of, my dear, but here you are and here you'll sit."


2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,242

29 Jul 2007, 10:06 pm

dalhousie12 wrote:
Wow So that is what that means and that makes so much sense now. Now i understand why project managers would tell me to assume my survey assistant knows nothing and tell him what to do. i could never really graspe that concept because i expected the assistant to have a little understanding of surveying and be able to take some initiative to do some things on there own without having to be told everything to do. There was many times i expected them to know what i was thinking and be able to know were i wanted them to go without being told. It lead to many survey assistants not wanting to work with me and most of them eventually quit. They eventually moved me into the office to a plan checking job which became less stressful for me.

Hopefully my personal example proves that i now understand theory of mind.


I almost FLUNKED geometry, because I didn't provide "proof". HECK, I thought it was OBVIOUS! I ended up getting an A and being the best in the class and perhaps the school, by the way.



Last edited by 2ukenkerl on 31 Jul 2007, 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

panamagrand
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jun 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 21
Location: Navigating from my nerve center.

29 Jul 2007, 10:23 pm

I hate having to explain my train of thought... zero patience for people who can't see where I'm going with stuff.
Really hard raising kids... I keep forgetting they don't already know what I know.


_________________
I was too thoughful to be happy. It was this everlasting thinking which distressed and tormented me.

Children have their sorrows as well as men and women; and it would be well to remember this in our dealings with them.

~ Frederick Douglas


2ukenkerl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,242

29 Jul 2007, 10:24 pm

LabPet wrote:
In essence, ToM means, "If I know something, then why don't you?" I am mindblind in a neurotypical world of mind readers, and they know. In Greek the word 'aut' means mind and this is where I live and can only observe outside - I cannot really 'know' another's thought, expression, motive, intent, feelings, etc. I am without pretense; I have no forward thinking - really naive. I find NTs to often be deceptive and I am honest to a fault. NTs tend to insert meaning where it does not exist. I tend to forget another cannot know what I am thinking! I cannot decipher social cues. I interact by choreographed cues and mimicry. I am a high-functioning autistic, certainly, but I am 100% autistic, whereas many, maybe even most, in this forum consider themselves only mildly autistic. I do appreciate and recognize this way of being, but I am not. I am designated as an Aspie only because I am cognitively advanced. I have sensory integration disorder(s) too, but that's separate from the topic of ToM.

There's versions of the ToM test - same principle though. 0_equals_true: It's Sally and Anne with a marble and basket, bowl, respectively! :D same concepts. Remember, dalhousie12, this is precisely why autistics are naturally scientist and artists (re: lack of ToM)! This 'deficit' is not necessarily wrong, just different. However, many do think it's wrong, irrational, immature, etc. Does this help? The concept is not really tangible but with real consequences.


WOW, you explained that SO well and yet SO succintly! I probably got fairly good at determining what a person knows around 10. Knowing what the probably think based on two different models probably happened a bit earlier because of people like my mother trying to convince me THEY knew about me, etc... I found that they have 2 basic models. In one they try to assume that you are protective, and another is dishonest, but they assume their other beliefs to be true.

I still generally have no pretense. I DO try to think forward, especially when a senseless question may be asked as a feeble attempt to back up an incorrect assumption. The truth doesn't matter, it is their BELIEF they believe and act on. I WAS really naive, and am still more naive than I would like. Even when I am NOT naive, I may act like I am, and succumb.

I used to be honest to a fault. I still live up to that statement my mother reminded me of when I was very young. She said "Do you ever lie?". I said "Well, I try NOT to.".

Quote:
I find NTs to often be deceptive and I am honest to a fault. NTs tend to insert meaning where it does not exist. I tend to forget another cannot know what I am thinking!


VERY true. 8(



dalhousie12
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,059
Location: A frozen baron wasteland, me and my friend tuk have to watch out for flying frozen hockey pucks Eh!

29 Jul 2007, 10:57 pm

Thanks for all your replies!

it will take me a few more times reading them and thinking very hard about it to get a better understanding. I look foward to the moment that it becomes crystal clear.

Are Nt's usually pretty good at finishing each other's sentences as they can read the other persons mind and see were there going with their thought? Or is it the other way around? This is something ive never thought about or never occurred to me but is it consider rude to finish one's thought?



Danielismyname
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,565

30 Jul 2007, 7:29 am

I haven't read that theory [of mind]....

LabPet, I liked your explanation of ToM; I also liked how you brought up the cognitive impairment in those who have autistic disorder (compared to Asperger); which is one of the main differences between the two (most people who're genuinely autistic have marked impairment in one or a number of areas).