naturalplastic wrote:
I can follow it when they explain Einstein's Theory of Relativity (in either books, or in TV docs). And even retain much of it.
But I cant follow the steps in brewing beer.
Wine is just fermented grape juice. But beer is this complex thing they make out of grain, hops, and sugar, and what not. And they put the stuff in vats and bake it, and then put into other vats to do something else to it. And If you deviate from the flow chart one way -your beer becomes ale, and another way it become lager, and another way it becomes India Pale Ale, and there is dark, amber, and light.
Ah, brewing is more an art than a science. I struggle with anything that involves biology as well. Horribly complex and I don't think they've figured it all out yet. Hence my problems with recipes for cooking and with gardening books. They're usually very unscientific. And "natural" things aren't so reproducible as relatively simple molecules. I used to grow E.coli bacteria that were genetically engineered to synthesise human proteins of medical interest - the results weren't absolutely reproducible by a long chalk, and the consensus among my colleagues was that E.coli are "little bastards." Don't get me started on the art of protein folding. Still, I persevered with such things, with some success, and I think they made me a "better" person than I would have been if I'd stuck to the exact sciences all my life.