cyberdora wrote:
But having a space in one's heart for his legacy is to respect the people who had to fight tyranny in the USA
That’s an absurd argument to make. I can respect “people who had to fight tyranny in the USA” and their legacy while not honoring, revering, or respecting one person. Not wanting to celebrate one individual doesn’t mean that I don’t respect his specific contributions to the movement, though, as I’ve already stated or implied in this thread. (“I’m thankful for all who played a role in the civil rights movement and for those who continue to fight for change.”)
I think we do a disservice to other historical figures and, perhaps, to our understanding of movements as a whole by focusing so much on specific individuals to the point of almost deifying them although that trend has begun to change in recent years which is a very good thing IMO. It seems likely to me that putting the focus on one person/one person’s legacy could potentially undermine the movement in some people’s minds depending on how serious his uncovered transgressions are.
Perhaps especially as a survivor of sexism, including of the extreme variety that was alluded to in recent posts, I can feel however I damn well feel about this topic, so don’t police my opinions or feelings. While we don’t know for sure that he was complicit in the rape and won’t until the documents are released in 2027, I have enough concerns about his other behavior to keep me from wanting to revere him in any capacity which is perfectly understandable under the circumstances…or it should be.
I didn’t say that everyone had to agree with me, but it would be cool if, on this particular topic, people would respect my right to have my own opinion without appeals to authority and talking down to me about his legacy as though I’m too stupid to know about it.