Watson, intelligence and autism
It seems now certain that intelligence is tied to genetic inheritance, but to state that Africans are (for their genetic dotage) less intelligent than Caucasians is a very silly thing to say, at least for two reasons. On is that there are no “Africans” as a homogeneous group, as there are no Caucasians either in the same sense . Second what is “intelligence”? Watsons seems to believe that intelligence has to do with math and, perhaps logic. If this were true, an idiot savant would be more intelligent than some sage intuitive person. Perhaps Watson himself seems to approach the stereotype of the idiot savant more than that of a delicate, intuitive person.
In his discovery (with Crick) of the double helix he was very much indebted to a woman: Rosalind Franklin, who died 38, two years before the Nobel assignment. He did not admit publicly of this debt and look how she talks of her. "She was just awkward," he said. "I think she was partially autistic." Clever people, he said, especially those with high mathematical abilities, often have autistic traits. He also says "I never had an exceptional mind – I certainly wasn't in the same league as Francis [Crick]. I think I've succeeded more by learning what needed to be done next, and getting help in getting it done. I was just very focused and impatient." And ambitious and ungrateful with Rosalind Franklin, whom he also attacked for her ugliness.
So what about Africans' intelligence? Not autistic enough?
No...James Watson is a brilliant man who made great strides in the field of genetics.
...What makes it all the more unbelievable why he makes these unbacked statements on race.
Friends of mine generally agree that I don't have a racist bone in my body. Please therefore accept this challenge for what it is, a challenge and nothing more.
Name a black (A.K.A. Afro-Caribbean) scientist
Sure, there are plenty of black actors, black musicians and black politicians but I cannot recall seeing any scientists. I am of course willing to be proved wrong.
Ed Almos
Name a black (A.K.A. Afro-Caribbean) scientist
Sure, there are plenty of black actors, black musicians and black politicians but I cannot recall seeing any scientists. I am of course willing to be proved wrong.
Ed Almos
Those issues are easily attributed to socio-economic difference not race per-se.
Name a black (A.K.A. Afro-Caribbean) scientist
Sure, there are plenty of black actors, black musicians and black politicians but I cannot recall seeing any scientists. I am of course willing to be proved wrong.
Ed Almos
Here are two:
Benjamin Banneker.
George Washington Carver (A hero of mine.)
I would also suggest that doing abstract scientific work is great for long term economic prospects (of the individual and the society), but when a person is worried about their next meal, investments in such theoretical matters are a luxury that is usually dispensed with.
>> Here's a page on African American Scientists of Note. <<
>> Here's a longer list <<
mmaestro
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1815a/1815ab61f3d3c419c4c576fea4ab95803375c97a" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 6 Aug 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 522
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
First thing to do, I think, is to look at what Watson actually said (or is at least reported to have said - there's no recording, and his comments where within a piece of prose that wasn't presented as a word for word interview, so it's kind of hard to know). Here's the link. And the relevant passage:
There's a mix of good and bad, in there. I've not seen a study that I'd consider credible that shows that blacks are less intelligent than whites. His comment on people who have to deal with black employees is particularly bad, because as a scientist he should know well that relying on anecdote is unreliable. In the book Blink, on the subject of people's abilities to do snap judgements, the scientist author tests at one point people's reactions to black vs. white people, and finds that all his test subjects react as if they believe the whites are more trustworthy than the blacks. He tests himself, and discovers his reactions are the same - he's a rascist on an unconscious level. And he is an African-American. If, as seems likely, none of us are able to get past racial stereotypes, I'm afraid that I can't accept that any controls for socio-economic status, education, etc. might be adequate in a study on intelligence and race.
Still, Watson's point on the fact that just because we wish we were all equal doesn't make it so is one well made. But there's little to be done about it. Believing that any study on the subject would be futile, I can't support there ever being one funded, and even if it were possible to control for all these factors, I think a study would be a dangerous thing. What if you discovered that blacks are less intelligent than whites? Everyone's an individual, but as with almost any generalization, you'd create a situation where everyone would have that judgement passed on them. Given the difficulties that blacks already have, giving rascists a justification for discrimination would be a terrible wrong, IMO.
Er... I think I digressed somewhat, there.
_________________
"You're never more alone than when you're alone in a crowd"
-Captain Sheridan, Babylon 5
Music of the Moment: Radiohead - In Rainbows
Last edited by mmaestro on 24 Oct 2007, 4:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Er... I think I digressed somewhat, there.
Not at all. An informative, rational discussion. I think Watson made some faulty generalizations that were based more on culture or personal experience than on genetics.
We make jokes, but don't really consider blonde women to be less intelligent. We talk about fiery red-heads, but generally get beyond that when dealing with individuals. But skin, we have trouble getting beyond that and seeing the person.
Name a black (A.K.A. Afro-Caribbean) scientist
Sure, there are plenty of black actors, black musicians and black politicians but I cannot recall seeing any scientists. I am of course willing to be proved wrong.
Ed Almos
What about Ronald Mallet, PhD? He is a scientist currently presenting a new method of theorizing time travel using lasers instead of gravitation. He was also one of the first black PhD's in theoretical physics in America.
Name a black (A.K.A. Afro-Caribbean) scientist
Sure, there are plenty of black actors, black musicians and black politicians but I cannot recall seeing any scientists. I am of course willing to be proved wrong.
Ed Almos
Here are two:
Benjamin Banneker.
George Washington Carver (A hero of mine.)
Aw, you beat me to it. I'm a fan of Banneker's, myself.
How about mathematicians?
Mathematicians of the African Diaspora
_________________
To eliminate poverty, you have to eliminate at least three things: time, the bell curve and the Pauli Exclusion Principle. Have fun.
he was apparently high on LSD at the time he discovered the double helix structure
_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social
Name a black (A.K.A. Afro-Caribbean) scientist
Sure, there are plenty of black actors, black musicians and black politicians but I cannot recall seeing any scientists. I am of course willing to be proved wrong.
Ed Almos
What about Ronald Mallet, PhD? He is a scientist currently presenting a new method of theorizing time travel using lasers instead of gravitation. He was also one of the first black PhD's in theoretical physics in America.
OH, I'd be happy to rent one of the old gravitation ones. You wouldn't happen to know someone that has a working one capable of working with a person, would you? HECK, I would even be willing to return just before he lets me on, so I could pay him well in ADVANCE! I don't dare pay earlier, because he might figure he doesn't need any more money, and start a paradox. 8-(
Seriously though, he really spoke of tendencies, and how they related to africans in africa. You have to admit that is generally a HORRENDOUS society over there. And many blacks over here don't help the stereotype by using pidgeon english, etc... or, once they have INGRAINED that in their young, calling it ebonics.
Granted, there are some pretty stupid whites, and even asians, also, but at least that often wasn't as bad and not as big a part of the population as a whole. ALSO, people seem to feel plenty free to use derogatory terms against such whites. Even WHITES do!
And those darn Kurds insist on speaking their own dialect, even when the nice Iraqis and Turks try to force them to speak correctly! Really, it is more about cultural dominance and power than intelligence. People who think that black dialects (or southern accents) are a sign of inferiority are merely projecting their own bias.
And those darn Kurds insist on speaking their own dialect, even when the nice Iraqis and Turks try to force them to speak correctly! Really, it is more about cultural dominance and power than intelligence. People who think that black dialects (or southern accents) are a sign of inferiority are merely projecting their own bias.
I never said anything about accents(BTW that has nothng to do with being black anyway.). OK, so WHY do they speak the way they do?
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Having Autism |
19 Dec 2024, 12:00 pm |
Autism and Fatigue? |
10 Dec 2024, 9:10 am |
How can autism be monetized? |
30 Jan 2025, 10:37 am |
Autism challenges |
12 Jan 2025, 1:29 pm |