Proof that the NT conspiracy starts young....

Post Reply New Topic

NT Baby clicky
..and remember we get proper news from the BBC... not your NBC/National Enquirer rubbish.....

chrisc

This is why I don't like this kind of science. It's really a form of manipulation on gullible people who then translate it into more reasons to treat people who aren't socially correct like dirt.

It's such a lie. I am not socially correct and I've been around babies and their mothers. The babies smiled and cooed at me. So much for this new age psuedo scientific psychological warfare.

If this article were truth, the baby would want nothing to do with me.

What I would like to know is, who are these people in charge of conducting this crap?

Sorry, Chrisc, I have to chuckle because I saw this same article (word for word) on American NBC!

Merle

Oh dear... I await the Beeb telling me that Elvis has just married Hitler on the Moon......

chrisc

I agree! In fact what I've noticed is that babies and young toddlers seem to be more drawn to me than to "normal" adults. My grandson has many grandmothers, grandfathers, great-grandmothers, great-grandfathers, great-great-grandmothers, and great-great grandfathers. Out of them all, I'm the one he talks about almost constantly.

I clearly see the conspiracy. There are some who aren't that way, but (sad to say) most of them seem to be out to get rid of us critical thinking, straight-forward speaking bunch!

Actually the BBC's being far more melodramatic about it than the article I saw on CNN. All the article on CNN said was that babies preferred to play with "helping" toys and didn't want to play with "hindering" toys, and that scientists already knew this, the surprise about the study was how young children start to show the preference.

I don't think there are many people, even with AS, who wouldn't rather play with someone they saw helping another person climb up a hill than with a person they saw pushing the other person down the hill. Which is all the test was. I mean, even with AS, if you saw one person push another person down on the ground and saw someone else help that person up, and then they asked you which person you'd rather associate with, you'd pick the helper and not the pusher. Right?

So to those who are saying "but babies like me!": sure, why wouldn't they? Unless you regularly shove people to the ground in front of babies, there's no reason (based on this study) that the babies wouldn't associate with you.

It seems to me that babies preference is mostly based on pleasent vs unpleaseant, not into judgement about morality, who is the good guy and the bad guy, which are social constructs that are learned. The danger on this, seems to be leading to the stereotype of who the bad guy is and who the good guy is.

I do attack stuffed animals sometimes in front of babies. Is that bad?

I do to, they laugh, they also like to watch them fight.

It leads to a career in media.

I would pick the one that got the ball to the top.

I thought it was a bad movie, I want to see the ball go to the top, then be attacked by stuffed animals!

Take me back to my crib now!

Science knows nothing of playing with toys.

It would be really cool if the ball went to the top, then shot across the room and killed stuffed animals.

All babies want to be mass murders.

If it shot across the room and killed Scientists, babies would laugh, and want to do it again.

All this comfirmed what was already known, wasted research money, and fed the media machine, your tax dollars at work.

Look how we are ripping you off! And you can't do anything about , for we are Government Scientists.

The evidence shows that babies support Republicans who want some to rise to the top, rather than Democrats who would tax the rich.

BBC is a pawn of the upper classes who have enslaved England.

Propaganda about how loyal subjects want the high and mighty to become higher and mighter.

Eat the Rich, stuffed animals for all!

It has been mentioned, but....

NBC is probably more balanced than the BBC, as far as news.
THEN is the BBC
The national Enquirer is KNOWN to be garbage. HECK, did you ever see MIB???? Even THAT show, that is based on a theory MANY laugh at, laughed at the enquirer. The enquirer is bought for only like 5 reasons:

1. Curiousity caused by wierd stories, half truths, etc..
2. Weird ads.
3. Sometimes they have a couple TRUE stories.
4. Amusement.
5. Conversation/gag gift/etc....

So the enquirer isn't anywhere in the same league as the other two.