Charges wrote:
kirayng wrote:
Did they give you the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test too? That's is a good indicator of learning disabilities in general, afaik and it was one of the tests that enabled my neuropsychologist to diagnose me.
Is that the one where you have to figure out the "rules" (and adapt when they change) for sorting cards with shapes on them into 4 groups? The one I had used sqaure white cards with triangles, stars, circles (I think...or was it squares?), or + shapes, which were either red, green, yellow, or blue, and in an overall formation of one of these shapes. For me, this was extremely easy.
Yes. If it was easy and you did well, then afaik that indicates no learning disability. I'll double check.
Also I re-read the part about sequencing the photographs to form a story. This task would be difficult for an autistic in certain contexts:
Here:
"Results consistent for the most part with those reported in Baron-Cohen, Leslie, & Frith 1985 have been obtained in a variety of subsequent studies.[3] In addition, a later study by Baron-Cohen, Leslie, & Frith (1986) employed a largely non-verbal test in which children were asked to put the frames of a picture story into the proper sequence. Where the sequence was one of mechanistic causality, children with autism performed at least as well as normal children and those with Down's syndrome. But where the "right" sequence (recognized immediately by normal adults) depicts a story involving false belief, the performance of autistic children was no better than chance, and far worse than that of normal and Down's syndrome subjects. "
Edited to add: If you want to tell me what tests were administered I can link the research behind it. I looked up all of my tests I had done and found out a lot of useful information.
Further: Yes, testing your IQ is required for an autism spectrum diagnosis. There are almost always discrepancies between performance and verbal IQ's in ASDs, which leads to diagnosis along with analysis of the other test results.