It depends on many things; circumstances, my whimsical mood, tone, what I think of the person giving it, and so on.
In general, I am very fearful of the notion of being wrong, factually, about something. So if I see a spoof documentary about how spaghetti grows on trees, and I go around telling people that spaghetti grows on trees. Then someone says, "No, that is wrong, double check that." And I do double-check, and find that I was wrong, I will be very grateful to the person who corrected me, made me less wrong. This is educational criticism, and I savor it.
If I care about some aspect of how I operate such that I'm willing to adjust something in order to accommodate others, I want to hear about this too. Some things are open to revision, and others are not. A few people here have told me my posts are too long. This is a simple function of how I think and communicate, and is not open to revision, so I tell such people to skip my posts (partly because I do know there are others who do read them, and have told me so). So the criticism is not bad, it is constructive but not actionable criticism from my perspective. (Yes, I'm technically mis-using "actionable", but the misuse is one that is in accordance with modern common usage.)
But, then some other people say they like to read my posts, but they are so long, and it is hard to keep track. And someone suggests, maybe more paragraph breaks. And I think, "Wow! That I can do, and so I will." And I am more inclined to listen, because the person who says this happens to be a friend. And then later I hear similar things from other people, and I think, that was good criticism. Imagine this message with no paragraph breaks. I used to write more like that, for all of my stuff is stream of consciousness. This is another criticism I savor, for it is constructive and actionable.
Then there are criticisms of me as a person. I'm happy and comfortable with who I am, not really inclined to change anything. Yes I'm very strange. Yes, I'm very unconventional; "bohemian", one of my friends is fond of calling me. Yes I’m blunt and tactless. So if someone says, say, I'm not social enough, need to go out more, I'm inclined to handle that kind of criticism poorly. As in, "f**k off and don't bother me about that again." poorly. The person giving the criticism may be well meaning, but I categorize these kinds of things as inherently unconstructive, and unwelcome. These kinds of criticisms tend to be rooted in misunderstanding, and tend to annoy me.
And then there are criticisms that are just plain wrong. I try to correct this as best I can, will spend a lot of time doing it, but will also eventually give up if I make no progress. I took a year off of work as a make-shift sabbatical a couple of years ago; it was a bad time in my life; I was very troubled and broken. And one of my friends (an old friend of some 20-odd years) kept saying, "You should get a job! You'll feel useless and not like a man if you aren't working."
And he believed what he said; but it was entirely wrong. I was perfectly comfortable not working, spending my time doing other things, or nothing at all. What he was doing was projecting his own feelings on to me as criticism, and it was absolutely and completely wrong. The "be more social" thing is similar, but this was just plain wrong and bad, unfounded criticism, and is also rooted in misunderstanding.
Good fortune,
- Icarus welcomes criticism, but reserves the right to react to it in nondeterministic ways...
_________________
Please forgive me if, in the heat of battle, I sometimes forget which side I'm on.