busy91 wrote:
I didn't realize this was not the normal way of thinking. I've always thought in pictures, I don't even know how one would think in words or verbally.
I remember when I first started reading, and even some time after that, I just kind of felt the meaning. Even TODAY, I can scan books VERY fast. I am almost embarassed to do it in book stores or libraries, because it looks PHONY, like the SCI-FI pictures with androids reading at a blinding pace. Of course, I read a LITTLE slower, and it is really SCANNING, basically looking for a certain word or format, or maybe an illustrated concept. At about half that speed I can actually read, but with relatively low comprehension, because it takes me longer to remember what I read. If I read by basically speaking mentally, it is at a veritable SNAILS PACE compared to that!
You mean you NEVER basically speak mentally? MOST people reading books DO do this. Anyway, THAT is what my verbal memory is like. Visually, I HAVE seen this very good, but it is almost as bad as my vision without my glasses. 8-( I have reason to believe that MOST claiming to have photographic memories(even autistics) are worse than I am. OTHERS may be far better. With irulan, for example, I think her level of ability for languages(HEY, she OBVIOUSLY does well, but I think someone with a REALLY eidetic memory could learn more faster and easier) indicates she isn't THAT good.
I WISH I could really SEE what you guys are talking about, but I may never see it.