Why Aspies ARE disabled, and we should embrace that.
"Welcome to the Disability Community" by Joel Smith (of http://thiswayoflife.org): http://thiswayoflife.org/blog/?p=287
Further commentary by Amanda Baggs (of http://autistics.org) and discussion thread:http://ballastexistenz.autistics.org/?p=480
If you ever argue that autism and/or Asperger’s is “a disability” because you think this configuration of our bodies partially, mostly, or entirely provides something negative in contrast to typical people, then please read it. This goes double if you argue it for something you call “low-functioning autism” but not for other autistic people. This goes triple or even more if you want to cut “high-functioning autism” and/or “Asperger’s” off of the “autistic spectrum” because they’re “not disabled” and “low functioning autistic people” are disabled. The person who wrote it only directed part of it at you, but from the standpoint he’s talking about, your viewpoint is nearly identical to the viewpoint I described in the first paragraph.
And of course, the viewpoint he’s talking about is also really important for you to read if you’re the sort of person who says it’s “neither an ability nor a disability,” or “composed of both abilities and disabilities,” or “both an ability and a disability,” or similar wording, because it’s also from the viewpoint he’s talking about pretty identical to the first two paragraphs.
What this is fundamentally about is the Social Model of Disability, which applies (although, sadly, isn't applied often enough) to mental difference as well as to physical, and teaches that it's not physical or mental difference which disables people, but the refusal of a disablist society to accept and accommodate our differences. While the social model of disability has been stereotyped as being all about physically disabled people (eg wheelchair users), IMO it's actually even more easily understandable in the context of neurodiversity.
I think it's failure to understand the definition of "disabled" and "disability" according to the social model of disability that leads many autistic people to argue that they are "not disabled" or that autism/AS/ADHD/whatever is "not a disability", and (whether consciously or unconsciously) take a snobbish or elitist attitude towards people with other types of impairments/disabilities.
"Disabled" doesn't describe who/what we are, it describes what is unfairly done to us. Recognise this, and we (in the autism community) can build much more powerful and mutually supportive links with all kinds of other disabled, dispossessed or marginalised people(s)...
Question is if not socializing the way society is, then what would be said about people who do not listen...
I socialize just not in the way people want small talk, talking about useless things that everyone else talk's about, going over stuff that I would think is private, & they should not be talking about it to friend's when I could imagine the person they talking about trusted them with this information...
The question is not if we can socialize its the fact that our socializing is not valid, we are not rewarded for the way we communicate, socializing is not defined on what socializing is, it is defined by the reward system of that type of socializing..
I get told to shut up, not listened to, so on... If I talk the way I want to socialize, I have to adapt myself to socialize the way they want it, not because I am disabled or not functioning, they say its not a disability until it becomes social & good communication skills...
They is less of us they fore we are dysfunction this kind of thinking goes on throughout history, like someone said if someone cannot tolerate something like left handed people what chance have we got..
We are neglected while growing up by society, then they want to force tones of information onto us to change into society, maybe they just covering up a huge mistake they made... Even dyslexic people have been caught in it breaking basic human wrights... Funny how a organization can take a person within a week & make them a whole lot better with dyslexia...
I certainly dont think I am disabled. Not sure what the medical defintion of a disability is but in my mind a disabled person is somebody who has a DX that prevents him/her from functioning independently in life and being able to enshure their own servival.
Tho I have a DX of HFA (which would be considered Aspie had I got DX'ed a few years after I did) I am not disabled because I enshure my own servival and am only dependent on myself. Their are HFA/Aspies who are disabled because they cannot enshure their own survival and thats why its a spectrum, everyone with the DX is different, one may be disabled, tho other is not. Just my opinion never would I call myself disabled.
_________________
DX'ed with HFA as a child. However this was in 1987 and I am certain had I been DX'ed a few years later I would have been DX'ed with AS instead.
I'm all for getting support from the government (for my kids at least) to help them pretend to be NT when they need to be but I'm encouraging them to celebrate who they are.
That means, I'm not telling them that they're broken or wrong but rather than they are different for a reason.
And that reason is? That we are all special and have our on unique roles to play in society? I'm sure you love your kids, but they are not special, they are freaks, and you know this deep down but don't want to accept it.
Face it people; we are damaged, and no amount of rationalization or blame-gaming is going to change that.
Yes, we are disabled. No, it's not something to celebrate.
And that reason is? That we are all special and have our on unique roles to play in society? I'm sure you love your kids, but they are not special, they are freaks, and you know this deep down but don't want to accept it.
Face it people; we are damaged, and no amount of rationalization or blame-gaming is going to change that.
Yes, we are disabled. No, it's not something to celebrate.
FRANKLY, I am an AMD in an intel world! Some things are slower, like math. Almost everything else is faster. I don't necessarily integrate as well. If you give an AMD processor an INTEL specific one, it may act incorrectly. Likewise, I respond incorrectly to some NT specific ones.
NOW, is AMD disabled? Is INTEL? Likewise, am I?!?!? Are NTs?!?!?
NOPE! We are all disadvantaged. It is simply that INTEL rules the market, and NTs are more common.
Anyway, I am all for keeping the disabled label for the government, because a disadvantage sometimes might as well be a disability. Some DO need help, etc...
I dont think i am disabled either.
However i was told that the main reason As and autism is included in disabilities is because if it isnt then they will not be covered by the disability discrimination act, meaning they could be discriminated as people choose!! !
In my view i think disability means stopping you doing things that you want to do, but i am not stopped by doing anything i want to do.
xx
I do, fervently, wish that people who say things like this would know, that disabled people have been fighting, in the disability rights movement described in those posts, to show that disabled does not mean broken or wrong, even when it does stem from a permanent injury of some kind.
I'm still working on a post dealing with all the objections people come up with to autistic people being considered disabled (which is very different from the question of autism being "a disability", which is an individual model of disability where disability resides entirely within the person, which neither Joel nor I was coming from when we wrote those posts, which was the point), and then sort of giving rebuttals from within the disability rights movement showing that other disabled people have been fighting against the same attitudes we have, often with the same responses.
I've been involved in several branches of the disability rights movement and I really, really wish that many autistic people understood how identical their concerns were to many other disabled people. Yes, we are low in the disability hierarchy which means being dissed by other aspects of the movement, but it doesn't mean we're not part of the broad overarching category here, and it's whether we like it or agree with it or not, as far as social models go.
_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams
Disabled means disadvantaged in particular ways (focused on people who've been disadvantaged in a way that's been heavily medicalized). Which is why to read the posts and then do as Joel suggests and poke around at a lot of disability rights stuff for awhile.

_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams
I think we are getting bogged down here, in semantics (again). I had to research this a few years ago for an article i was writing, as well as a book. OK, times and ideas change fast in society, but I don't think they change THAT fast.
What I discovered then and still feel is current - disability is not only physical, it can be hidden as well. A physical disability can be hidden or apparent; a mental/emotional/social disability can also be hidden, or apparent.
But a disability does NOT mean (necessarily) anything negative.
Which brings us to "handicap". You can be disabled, but still able to do everything you choose to do. Your particular handicap may influence the choices you make, but if it does not stop you doing anything you want, you are not handicapped by it.
Often, handicap is what is imposed on us by society. People's attitudes, etc. Again, you still (often) have a choice - to take what people say on board and let it diminish you, or to ignore it and carry on being who you want to be. If what is being imposed on you is physical limitation, then it is hard to ignore or carry on. You can't continue down a road when someone places a security barrier on it.
I am physically disabled. I have MS. There is a constant underlay of muscle weakness. before my disability, I could ice skate really well. I always wanted to learn to ski, but was HANDICAPPED by lack of money. Now I'm handicapped by increased disability. I was able to continue ice skating for ten years after I developed this condition, but when I last tried, my muscles had grown too weak for me to maintain my balance on that narrow bar of steel.
In other aspects of my life, I have walked away from doors which are now closed, and kicked open a few others. I have found other things I am good at which now occupy my energies. Because I do not engage in areas where my disability is likely to be an issue, I do not consider myself handicapped.
Think of it in terms of a golf handicap. Or horseracing. There, a handicap is imposed on the more proficient, in order to bring things back to a fairer level for all players. I teach chess to local kids - if I see a very unbalanced chess match about to begin, I will impose a handicap on the better player - play without your queen. This makes the game play for longer, makes the better player work harder, gives the weaker player more chance to learn. It also benefits the better player who learns to do well with his remaining pieces. If the better player wins, he can say, "I won - without using my queen."
It is from here that we get the concept of "handicap". But society's imposing of handicaps is not always done in the spirit of making things fairer. Because "society" is a catch-all word for life with other people involved, what we are describing is something chaotic. Laws are imposed on all society, some of those laws designed to keep things as fair as possible. New buildings are supposed to include consideration for physically disabled users - ramps, wider parking spaces with a disabled logo, toilet doors opening outwards, that sort of thing. These laws are designed to reduce the handicap. Trust me, nothing society does will change my disability.
I do consider Asperger's and autism to be a disability, but I do not necessarily see it as a handicap. I have raised my children (on the spectrum) to see it this way as well. Their disability IS apparent to others (not everybody) so we can't 'pretend' there is nothing out of the ordinary there. So we tell people, and that knowledge generally leads to a better understanding and less hassles. Anyone continuing to hassle, especially after knowing the diagnosis - t hey are in breach of a number of human rights laws and will feel my steel-capped boots in their rear. or at least, my lawyer's. They now have absolutely no excuse, if they try to impose a handicap on me or my kids.
I embrace "disability" because it IS part of who I am. I do not let it limit me in any way, but I keep actively enjoying a full and productive life.
I am using the definitions I expressed here, to make this statement.
Face it people; we are damaged, and no amount of rationalization or blame-gaming is going to change that.
Yes, we are disabled. No, it's not something to celebrate.
I'm "damaged?" Multiple universities have offered me full-ride scholarships. A couple have even offered to PAY ME to attend their schools. I feel like I'm doing pretty well thus far in life, certainly much better than most of the "normal," "undamaged" people around me.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Good for you. Education means nothing if you lack the social networking skills to make a career of it.
Good for you. Education means nothing if you lack the social networking skills to make a career of it.
And social networking skills mean nothing if you lack the intelligence to be successful in a given career.
I can get by just fine. I might have to work harder to compensate for my lack of social graces, but that will be at least partially offset by my ability and academic record. My point was that Asperger's hasn't hindered me, so I would not consider myself "damaged." My dad is Aspie, and he has had a long and successful career. He may lack the social networking skills to maneuver through the office politics, but on the occasions when co-workers have attempted to damage his career, he was simply good enough at doing his job that they ended up looking foolish.
_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH