pete1061 wrote:
I'm totally full of myself according to this article. I scored 96, I guess nobody will like me here now.
I didn't really like the tone of the article. It had more of an opinion tone to it, rather than any kind of objective analysis. Scientific American is not the respectable publication it used to be, they have caved to pop science in recent years, it ranks more with Discover magazine now.
The author made it sound like introversion & narcissism are mutually exclusive things.
I think maybe there could also be some confusion between narcissism and extremely low self esteem. Narcissism implies a very high self image, but both a very high and very low self image are lumped under the umbrella of narcissism.
I will admit to having a very low self esteem.
Pete, I don't know you, but I assure you I will judge you by who you are rather than by the results of some silly test, and I think most people at WP are fair-minded enough to do the same. We've all been judged by unfair terms in the past.
I can understand you score. When I was younger, I would've scored much higher than I do now. Nor does Scientific American have much credibility left.